« Review: High School Musical 3 | Main | Femme Films of the Week -- 10/24/2008 »

October 24, 2008

Thriller

I just watched Michael Jackson's Thriller with my kids tonight and was struck by how well it's held up for me since I first saw it when I was a teenager. And then I started wondering ... how many movies that I've seen in, say, the last couple years, would hold up so well after so long?

The Lives of Others, Pan's Labyrinth, Children of Men, Juno, The Proposition, Little Children, Juno, Little Miss Sunshine, Away from Her ... I'm sure there are others, but off the top of my head, these are a few that (I think) will still play as well for me 20 years hence. Which films of the last few years really stand out for you?

Posted by kvoynar at October 24, 2008 09:18 PM

Comments

There Will Be Blood, No Country, Proposition, Domino, Collateral, Assassination of Jesse James, American Gangster (OWNAGE), Casino Royale (in the sense that every Bond movie gets the requisite Spike marathon viewings several times a year), Snow Angels, Into the Wild*, The Departed.

On the FLIP side, I don't think some of that Charlie Kaufman stuff will stand the test of time -- Malkovich and Eternal were on my ten lists in their respective years, but I've never had one iota of interest in revisiting them.

*And Into the Wild might be one of those cases where either the older you get, the less you relate to it... OR could be opposite and the more you wish you'd have been more carefree.

I think I'm prejudiced towards remembering and rewatching grim, violent widescreen movies, usually either existential downers or gritty crime flicks; For whatever combination of personal quirks, COMEDIES rarely if ever get the rewatch, nor do domestic dramas. So despite my inclusion of things like "Sideways" or "Little Children" at or near the very top of my lists, they're not the kind of thing I ever want to revisit, whereas I'll park myself in front of "Collateral" or "American Gangster" three times a day on ever coast's feed of Cinemax, coming in and out of it and entertained every time.

Posted by: LexG [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 25, 2008 02:12 AM

Oh, on the "Thriller" tip: I first saw that video on FRIDAY NIGHT VIDEOS in what must've been late 1983... seems it was around the week that D.C. CAB dropped in theaters, and no, I do not know why I'd remember such a thing.

Also, used to own that MAKING OF on VHS, with Landis and Jackson clowning around.

I was all about that album there at age 10, to the point where TO THIS DAY, I do not understand how it is considered a 1982 album. That album WAS 1983. How the HELL was Thriller a 1982 album? And yet the release date is definitely listed as November 1982. Just always seemed to me that BILLIE JEAN and BEAT IT dropped in '83. Maybe there was a first single from late '82 that didn't drop in my Podunk neck of the woods?

All I remember is everyone suddenly HAVING to have that well into '83.

(This pointless anecdote brought to you by Sober, Nostalgic Douche Mode Lex.)

VOYNAR OWNS.

Posted by: LexG [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 25, 2008 02:19 AM

GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK still ranks for me as the best film of the decade so far. So dense, so smart, so entertaining. It will never date.

And I must confess a soft spot for OSS 117: CAIRO, NEST OF SPIES, which made me laugh harder than any movie in years. And since it too is a period piece, it'll hold up beautifully. Can't wait for the sequel (set in Rio).

Posted by: Cadavra [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 25, 2008 11:16 AM

Cadavra! I can't believe someone else loves OSS-117! I saw that a couple years ago at the Seattle Film Fest and absolutely loved it. One of the most brilliant political satires ever, I wish it had gotten wider play in the States. Its widest release was only 13 theaters. It played hugely well at Seattle, I think it could have done better here had it been marketed differently.

Posted by: Kim Voynar [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 25, 2008 04:43 PM

I don't know that the marketing itself was bad, but it was a start-up distrib that obviously had limited resources and couldn't spend as much as it would've liked. (Not to mention it doesn't SOUND like a comedy.) Remember, too, that foreign films are a tough sell as it is, and one that's a pure entertainment--as opposed to the doom-and-gloom type seemingly preferred by art-house audiences--is an even harder slog.

Posted by: Cadavra [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 26, 2008 02:39 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?