« You! Yes, you! Can Be a Superhero! | Main | New Years Confession #1 »

December 31, 2008

Which Men Should Get Oscar Nods ... and Which Men Shouldn't

And just to clarify up front: this is a discussion of who I think most deserves to be nominated for the Best Supporting Actor and Best Actor categories, not who I think the Academy, in all its collective wisdom, is likely to put there. There are others who are far better at playing the Oscar ponies than I am, and I'll let them have at that game; meanwhile, I offer you the following thoughts on which actors most deserve a shot at going home on Oscar night with a naked golden man in their arms.

Read the rest of this entry ...

Posted by kvoynar at December 31, 2008 06:50 PM

Comments

Rourke was quite good in The Wrestler, but I couldn't help the feeling that he was basically playing himself, and that much of the accolades were for his attempt to reboot his acting career. But said acting career was done in by self-sabotage, and his 'comeback' shouldn't be placed on a higher pedestal than other performances by actors who took better care of themselves.

I feel the same way about Health Ledger. His work as The Joker was phenomenal and would have likely gotten acclaim regardless, but much of the critical buzz revolved around him inexplicably dying before the release. I'd feel better championing the same performance given by a man who wasn't so irresponsible as to accidentally (?) kill himself, leaving his daughter without a father and completely wrecking Michelle Williams' life by turning her into an unwilling paparazzi magnet.

Posted by: Scott Mendelson [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 11, 2009 04:48 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?