« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »
June 28, 2007
[LOOK] Ending Zabriskie Point (1970, ***)

MICHELANGELO ANTONIONI’S ZABRISKIE POINT is often cited as one of the greatest follies made by a great filmmaker, but have any of those writers watched it lately? While its 1960s youth-culture-on-the-run-story, with echoes of Kent State (credited to Antonioni, Sam Shepard, Tonino Guerra and Claire Peploe) is often blunt and the acting wooden, it’s one of the most striking uses of light and space in a filmography built upon such concerns. Take the last scene alone, an explosive 10-minute fantasia of the end of consumerism. Sometimes I think it’s the greatest thing I’ve ever seen, just for how it looks and sounds, and not even for any of its many meanings. You know Spike Jonze and Michel Gondry have seen it; there’s a shared understanding with Antonioni of objects and space, the concreteness of objects within not-fully occupied spaces. A character imagines a modernist house on a hill, and all its furnishings, exploding in extreme slow motion, detonating again and again. It maybe be one of the greatest fuck-you endings ever, but who’s the “fuck you” to? The audience in 1970? James Aubrey’s craven administration of MGM? The youth movement? Acquisitiveness itself? Narrative? Me when I saw it 22? You? Me watching it today? You seeing it this week? Someone who recalls their own flipbook of recollection of first exposure to images of fluttering destruction on 9/11? You can watch the closing scene here as well as the original trailer, “where a boy… and a girl…. meet… and touch… and blow their minds… Zabriskie Point… How you get there depends on where you’re at,” the amusingly dated promo goes. A folly, to be sure, but its photography, boldly colored and concrete, also borders on abstraction, a dislocated gaze upon practical and temporary things. Explosive. Cue the Floyd. [Ray Pride.] (Zabriskie Point shows at Siskel in Chicago June 29 at 6pm and July 1 at 3pm.)

Posted by Ray Pride at 07:20 PM | Comments (0)
June 26, 2007
I'm really afraid that someday someone who has political differences with Michael Moore will call him fat
Posted by Ray Pride at 06:23 PM | Comments (0)
June 25, 2007
Indie returns Wednesday
Posted by Ray Pride at 03:23 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
June 22, 2007
Andy Jones
David Poland IM'ed me a few hours ago with the news that entertainment journalist Andy Jones died after a heart attack during a screening of A Mighty Heart at the Arclight last night. I let that soak in for a bit and just now read David's quick appreciation of Jones. I don't have much to say, except that whenever Andy and I crossed paths in the years I've known him, mostly in Los Angeles, it was always a pleasure to see this exuberant man walk into the room: he listened well, he laughed better. Gabby without cattiness, he flirted with the world like it deserved to be flirted with. It's Friday night: I really wish I weren't going to spend the rest of the evening thinking about how many of our acquaintances, friends, peers, get taken for granted. But they do. Dammit. [Poland's 1999 nod to Jones and his influence is here.]
Posted by Ray Pride at 11:59 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
June 21, 2007
Talking technique with Michael Winterbottom about A Mighty Heart (2007, ***)
MICHAEL WINTERBOTTOM’S FIFTEENTH OR SO FEATURE, with a reported $16 million budget, distributed by Paramount Vantage, the arthouse arm of the larger company, is a star vehicle for Angelina Jolie, but also not a star vehicle.
Drawn from the memoirs of Marianne Pearl, the widow of Wall Street Journal investigative staffer Daniel Pearl (Dan Futterman) who
was executed in 2002 after being kidnapped in Pakistan over his reportage and for being Jewish as well, A Mighty Heart allows Jolie to disappear into a buzz of fact and confusion, of investigation and concern and perplexity. Winterbottom likes to drop viewers into the midst of a world, like a restless documentarian might, and cleanly yet somewhat obliquely offer up all the information we need, as in recent pictures like the futurist fever dream of Code 43, (2003); the rock-show-and-sex 9 Songs (2004); the hybrid doc-fiction of The Road to Guantánamo (2006) and the refugee’s odyssey of the stunning In This World (2002). (He shares a knack for detail and instants of behavioral authenticity demonstrated through work with directors like Michael Mann: here is a world, do you see it?)
The 46-year-old Winterbottom started working with cinematographer-camera operator Marcel Zyskind with the guerilla shoot of In This World, and has worked with him on seven films since, largely with handheld DV cameras, including here. No rehearsals, masters or close-ups, just takes that mostly ran the length of a scene, shot mostly in natural light, in the sequence they happened historically from Pearl’s disappearance through the weeks of mystery after. Winterbottom claims not to even call action or set any sort of blocking marks for the camera, often guiding Zyskind by touches and grabs of the shirt.
“He’s very young,” Winterbottom says when I ask Zyskind’s age. He’s Danish, and on 24 Hour Party People, Robbie Muller worked the camera, the great cameraman, and he’d just worked with Lars von Trier [on Dancer in the Dark], and Marcel was his assistant, and he came over to be Robbie’s assistant. The next film was In This World, and the idea was [having] a very small crew, one person on camera, one person on sound. We were going to spend all this time traveling across the desert. I just wanted someone enthusiastic and young.” Someone more experienced would “have to have a crew behind them. Marcel was incredibly young, I think he was 21 or 22 at the time.”
He’s become Winterbottom’s right-hand collaborator, and they’ve evolved a working method across several films, especially in the more fleet, limber formats of digital video. What about the shirt-tugging? Winterbottom laughs readily. “Yeah, we do a lot of that, I’m afraid. It’s weird. The thing is that… You gradually have to react to what you’re doing. So in the case, from In This World onwards, [we] want to shoot in a way [that’s simple]. There’s a lot of traveling in In This World. We’re following
the two guys, the two refugees. They are actors, but they’re also refugees [in real life]. So if we’re in a market and following them, he’s just basically shooting, I can maybe see something he can’t, he’s concentrating on them. So I’d be batting him, pointing this way or that way, or signaling he’s too close or, I think we’ve got the shot. To allow the action to continue and flow like in real time, we’d do it differently each time, it isn’t like we’d do exactly the same shot and let it run fifteen minutes every time. We obviously did more shots. But we’d get enough material [without traditional coverage] that we could cut that together. It started like that.”
The technique has grown. “But when you get into the house [in A Mighty Heart where everyone awaits word on the developments in the case] where you’ve got seven or eight actors, and most the key ones are professionals, and coming in and out are actors who are not professionals, you kind of get a little bit more nervous about tugging and shouting, or whispering and stuff, but at the same time I still wanted the actors to be able to run the scene through. Some first takes might be fifteen minutes long. I want to give [the actors] the flow they need but I also want to make sure I have the material I want to use in the film. It’s not just that she does great things, but… It’s not only about cutting, because these days you can cut almost anywhere. It’s weird, the whole traditional cutting rhythm can be different, but you want to be in the right place. For me, it’s about accumulating enough moments that feel right and strong enough to be in the film. Marcel’s a great operator, but obviously if I think Angie is doing something stronger here than here, I’d ease him over. Since I’m the person who’s going to be putting it together afterwards, I want to make sure that I have enough stuff. I stop filming when I feel I have enough stuff.” Winterbottom pauses, leans forward to offer another tribute to his young collaborator. “But he’s doing loads and loads of stuff! I’m not pushing and shoving him all the time!”
[A Mighty Heart opens wide Friday across the country.] [Ray Pride] [Winterbottom photo © 2007 Ray Pride]
Posted by Ray Pride at 04:02 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
June 20, 2007
Portraits: Eagle Vs. Shark, You Kill Me, A Mighty Heart
Taika Waititi, director of Eagle Vs. Shark.

John Dahl, director of You Kill Me.

Michael Winterbottom, director of A Mighty Heart.
Loren Horsley, co-star of Eagle Vs. Shark.

[Photographs © 2007 Ray Pride.]
Posted by Ray Pride at 03:34 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
June 17, 2007
Garrulous claptrap: Day Watch (2006, ** 1/2)
(Denevnoy dozor) With Day Watch, Russian writer-director Timur Bekmambetov accelerates the garrulous claptrap of the first entry in his post-Soviet vampire trilogy, Night Watch Imagine the carnage of the climax of Joe Carnahan’s Smokin’ Aces, but for over two hours. Imagine Moscow laid waste to destruction more nihilist than Roland Emmerich’s 1990s dreams of ruin like Independence Day. Bekmambetov’s visual and storytelling flourishes are beyond baroque, as furiously inventive as Guillermo del Toro, but with less control and lyricism. Yet this slab of magical miserablism, of moral and literal verdigris, also functions as synecdoche of sorts for Putin-era mayhem of a decaying, decadent society of grime, slime and cash, a time of authoritarian chaos that sees the wanton imprisonment and even murder of oligarchs, journalists and motley adversaries? The only answer: burn it to the ground, siege Moscow like a latter-day Leningrad. Another culture, another capitalism: it’s plain that the movie is very Russian, and surely holds more resonance back home with its growls, barks and muttering of dialogue, or the identity of famous guests at a party, and the relentless product placement. (A slightly more esoteric reference: the incomprehensible battle between the two vampire factions is adjudicated by a pair of Andrei Tarkovsky look-alikes who lean on canes with mirroring gestures.) While Bekmambetov repeats his oft-inspired, always amusing play with the English subtitles—a hard knock at a door causes a word to shake; when someone yells “Bastard!” while breaking a plate, the letters shatter—his willingness to be full-tilt incomprehensible may be his greatest strength. The end credit sequence is terrifically bold. (The Russian trailer is below.) [Ray Pride.]
Posted by Ray Pride at 06:39 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
June 16, 2007
[LOOK] A teaser for Paul T. Anderson's There Will Be Blood
Posted by Ray Pride at 11:46 PM | Comments (0)
June 14, 2007
[LOOK] "Good Morning, America" correspondent attempts to explain what journalism is to Michael Moore
Didn't anyone tell Michael Moore not to talk back to his betters? Bad Harvey! Bad.
Posted by Ray Pride at 10:40 AM | Comments (0)
[LOOK] Cursing the darkness: re-ending The Sopranos
Somebody asked for it...
Posted by Ray Pride at 09:14 AM | Comments (0)
June 13, 2007
[LOOK] Ain't that America for you and me? Tommy Chong vs. MSNBC
Somehow, this brief clip functions as self-critique: the best criticism of modern media is to display modern media. Is there a reason that cable news ratings are so low? What on earth did this woman expect this man to say to her? And: why was there live coverage of Paris Hilton being escorted to jail? This splitscreen image is pretty remarkable for its intense vacuity, suiting the segment anchor. "Did you smoke anything today?"
Posted by Ray Pride at 04:44 PM | Comments (0)
June 12, 2007
[LOOK] The Marx Bros. in color
Twenty seconds of Technicolor behind the scenes of Animal Crackers. [Via Leonard Pierce at Screengrab.]
Posted by Ray Pride at 04:10 PM | Comments (0)
June 11, 2007
Don't Stop -: About a cut
YOU KNOW SOMEONE'S BEEN THINKING when they manage to come up with a simple cut that surpasses anything you could do with the image itself, and with the inspired final scene of "The Sopranos," is David Chase really the first person use Journey's "Don't Stop Believin'" to create a parallel to Samuel Beckett's novel, "The Unnameable"?
("Where I am, I don't know, I'll never know, in the silence you don't know, you must go on, I can't go on, I'll go on.") Heady stuff. I don't get the television critics who are wailing this morning, like Mary McNamara in the L.A. Times and Charlie McCollum of the Mercury News. At least Heather Havrilesky, as you'd expect, has her shit together, in the best read I've seen, over at Salon. "Just like the rest of us. Going to hell in a red leather booth, with Journey playing in the background." Not quite "And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past," but fine nonetheless.

Posted by Ray Pride at 02:27 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Four Eyed Monsters (*** 1/2)
Not a review, but a link to Arin Crumley and Susan Buice's sweet, restless, strangely charming movie, on YouTube for the rest of the week.
Posted by Ray Pride at 01:58 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
LOOK: Superbad and the red-band trailer
As the opening card of the trailer warns, Superbad has an R rating for "pervasive crude and sexual content, strong language, drinking, some drug use and a fantasy/comic violent image -- all involving teens." Consider yourself warned.
Posted by Ray Pride at 01:43 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
June 09, 2007
Once: Singular sensation (2007, ****)
JUST BECAUSE EVERY MOVIE REVIEWER IN AMERICA is calling Once something like the greatest music movie of this generation and the best thing since two pints of Guinness on a sleepy Dublin Sunday is no reason not to listen to me as I grab you by the collar and tell you listen, listen to these songs, embrace this movie, because this muss of twigs and straw and strings and pixels and chords can break your heart like a four-minute-fifty second pop song you will never get out of your head.
Once is slightly, just a bit more than nothing at all, yet it is one of the rare movies where any recollection of the simplest gesture, smile, or catch of voice in it have made me stupid-teary since I first saw it (twice) at Sundance. The grave, tender secret of this tiny picture is, simply, its simplicity, its sketchy but efficient form filled with the grandest of longings.
In John Carney’s limber long-player, several songs suggest a life, a small, wonderful world consisting of a few Dublin haunts where an unnamed street corner performer, or “busker,” (Glen Hansard) and an unnamed younger woman (Markéta Irglová) with a winsome command of English, meet, tease, learn, but mostly with eyes wide open develop a mature relationship deepened by the dance of several songs, including the gorgeous “Slowly Falling,” which the extremely affable and charming pair convincingly “compose” in front of us in an early scene.
In standard narrative terms, Once is the slightest of artifacts, and yet it is filled a quiet integrity and charm and it offers lessons in how simply a tale can be told. Shot in two weeks in unprepossessingly grungy Mini-DV, it is a grand, effortless Irish musical povera (shot in two weeks for aboutu 100,000 euro), written and directed by Carney, who was for several years in the fine band, The Frames, with star-composer Glen Hansard. (An NPR commentator memorably dubbed Hansard “a longtime master of sublimely melodramatic sad-bastard music.”) Carney work some very sophisticated insights about the representation of music on film and also how one walks, talks, lives, breathes, stumbles, fumbles, triumphs, while trying to fashion any form of art. Layers peel away, their preconceptions of each other (and ours of them) fall away, and Hansard’s music, as urgent and lovely as ever, grows in collaboration with someone who turns out not only to be a classical pianist, but a good lyricist and a fine singer. The film’s clarity about the happenstance of fruitful collaboration is rare. (In the real world, Hansard and Irglová had already written and performed together.)
There’s a whiff of the succinct bittersweetness of David Lean’s Brief Encounter, a sing-a-long (in Hansard’s own gaff) hints at James Joyce’s short story, “The Dead,” and the place of the young Czech woman in contemporary Ireland suggests the change in the Irish mindset after the “Celtic Tiger,” or vast economic boom that began in the 1990s. But that is not text, those are smart, lovely undercurrents: text in the tale is moments, moments such as the look on The Guy’s face when he catches the disappointment on the Girl’s face after a clumsy, presumptuous pass.
Like with a song, each listener invests a different measure of heart and hopes in this boy-meets-girl perplex, the pair birth a song, they bond beyond romance that’s the clothesline for their ample charm. There’s nothing oblique, only merely suggestive, like lyrics. Songs are omnipresent in movies, filmmakers are constantly plying the power of music.
But the portrayal of music hardly ever works on screen. Why? Do you have a CD player, an iPod? You swim and surface in a sea of song by day and night. You walk the walk, hope in your head, song in your ears, going slowly deaf perhaps, but the narrative of your waking consciousness is scored, and you would not give that up for the world. You walk through this movie, not once, but every sunny hopeful moment you listen to music, shuffling faster toward the horizon line.
Even essential French film theorist Andre Bazin would likely have embraced this small wonder: he believed the long take and documentary-style elements suggested a greater truth than editing. You, dear reader, could have made this movie. (Carney told me that Once should look like anyone’s home videos posted to YouTube.)
The music under the final scenes is a reprise of a song called “When Your Mind’s Made Up.” We’ve heard it before. We’ve been there. We’re here. It packs an immense wallop: this is how pop works; this is how songs happen in our lives. It is a man’s voice, then a woman’s voice, in harmony, where the singers (and listeners) can but smile. This is the look (and sound) of love—heartfelt, unabashed, and ultimately at farthest remove from the saccharine that is sentimentality.
Kurt Vonnegut famously remarked that music was proof of the existence of God. Once, to me, is proof of the potential of movies, and proof of love and friendship and creative bonds, of more life in the time that we have, in a life that can grow beyond boundaries. Once adds 200 locations on June 8. [
Ray Pride. Photo (c) 2007 Ray Pride.]
Posted by Ray Pride at 11:44 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
June 07, 2007
Ocean's Thirteen (2007, ***)
I’D BEEN STUCK ON HOW TO WRITE ABOUT OCEAN’S THIRTEEN, which I had a lot of fun watching, and after after tossing a third,
fucked draft, I scanned some movie-related blogs while digging up links, all solipsistic and self-aggrandizing in uncommon extreme, and I happened upon some late-era Andrew Sarris; same difference. (The king of the block self-quote would have made a fine, self-involved blogger if he’d been born to a different era.) I hated everything I’d been reading but then I wrote in a hurry, deadline dash like a trained newspaperman, and wound up pretty much content with everything I wrote except the word I. (Did you ever break out in a satirical rash?) Plus I’d meant to open a piece with the word “and” for at least 72 hours. So after a screening double-feature of Lajos Koltai’s Evening and Michael Winterbottom’s A Mighty Heart, I managed to finish the task. (Yi-yi-I.) But…
And I don’t even like soufflé.
Steven Soderbergh’s all-American guilt complex must have kicked in like mad after the reception of Ocean’s Twelve, a movie that seemed more a calculated insult to audiences worldwide than a worthy diversion.
Honestly, I felt so bruised by the second of the Soderbergh-Clooney-Pitt capers that I can’t summon up a single clear memory of a moment of it. (I do remember seeing it while suffused with Dr. Pepper.) At the time, I wrote, “Dandelion fluff, cat dander, motes of dust: all these minor irritants have more substance than the dashed-off insult that is Ocean’s Twelve.” While Steven Soderbergh’s my-friends-are-so-hip-they-float Ocean’s Eleven makes an ideal companion on a transatlantic flight if you’re jacked up on antihistamines, the weightless, worthless spectacle of Ocean’s Twelve, pointlessly criss-crossing a few grainy patches of Europe, is little more than a vision of a dozen or more millionaires jacking off in a loose circle.” (Imagine how I felt. )
While there’s no real narrative tension in the new installment, it’s delightful in almost every frame and each particular. These characters are hoods, rogues, cads, and mean to some people who don’t really deserve it, but it’s all in the service of getting back at Willy Bank (Al Pacino), a macher who’s shoved their mentor, Reuben Tishkoff (Elliott Gould, whose mensch-tastic comic timing remains sterling at the age of 68) out of his percentage of Vegas’ latest mega-casino. Pacino: “I don’t need the labor pains! I just WANT the BABY!” The name of Pacino’s character is typical of the lightly brassy in-jokery in this edition: The notorious bank robber Willie Sutton was the one who answered, “Why do you rob banks?” with a reply of supernal logic: “Because that’s where the money is.” Thus: Willy Bank. (Pacino gets a few of his patent street-mongrel moments to howl and growl, and he’s man-tanned to the patina of a fine chocolate Lab.)
Really, Ocean’s Thirteen had me beaming from the opening credits, where the current Warner Bros. presentation credit, which is kind of dull, was monkeyed with in a way that’s both retro and now-retro, lightly jazzy, easy on the eyes. That animation draws on a similar marzipan palette to cameraman “Peter Andrews”’ (Soderbergh) visual style and Philip
Messina's production design, filled with terrific oblong compositions, heavy on acute lines slashing across the frame in landscapes and hotel corridors, and deeply hued blues and reds and yellows and greens. There are other clever design strokes that work without footnotes, such as The Bank's twirling towers that yearn to the sky being a patent cop of Santiago Calatrava's odd apartment building in Malmo, Sweden, the HSB Turning Torso.
The plot is absurd and complications pile upon complications, to the point of creating a backup plan that involves a man-made earthquake effected by a manyton drill that dug the French side of the Chunnel. But it’s toothsome throughout. Herewith: Danny Ocean (George Clooney) and the gang go for their priciest, diciest heist after his double-cross of Reuben lands him in a hospital bed after a heart attack. Enter: Brad Pitt and Matt Damon, who throughout keep tongues thoroughly in dimpled cheeks and have a certain amount of fun with their public and personal profiles. Plus: Ellen Barkin vamping as Bank’s second-in-charge; Casey Affleck and Scott Caan, who wind up fomenting a labor strike at a Mexican maquiladora dice factory, fueled by Zapata tequila (named after the revolutionary, a comic foreshadowing of Soderbergh’s upcoming pair of pictures about Che Guevara). David Paymer gets some mileage as a painfully distressed undercover hotel-rater for the “Five Diamonds” status that Bank has earned for earlier elephants, and Carl Reiner plays a hi-ho cheerio chap whom the staff are fooled into believing is the actual reviewer while Ocean’s men do many painful things to Paymer.
Another in-joke: the ding-a-ling that 85-year-old Reiner’s Saul Bloom confects, Kensington Chubb, boasts an exceptionally tall and strange curly white quiff atop his head that makes him a dead ringer to 84-year-old Viacom chairman Sumner Redstone, with whom Soderbergh has likely had run-ins with in the egregious stall-outs at Paramount Pictures of his repeated attempts to make a film of “Confederacy of Dunces.” Soderbergh in-japed Redstone before: (An early working title of Full Frontal was “How To Survive a Hotel Room Fire,” a seeming reference to a notorious incident in the life of the long-lived mogul. A second attempt at naming that mulligatawny was “The Art of Negotiating a Turn,” which seems to apply as well to the man’s myriad moves in an eclectic career.
Ocean’s Thirteen demonstrates tremendous directorial command, and I still await every Soderbergh movie with intense expectation. (And I still remember the times he’s told me I’m a jerk for liking The Underneath, which is the movie that sent him into the push-me-pull-you pattern of his career.) Afterwards, I didn’t feel full from this larky malarkey, but I didn’t feel stuffed, I felt just right: Soderbergh + Co., including screenwriters Brian Koppelman and David Levien (Rounders) have captured their own cavalier, rico-suave, effortless tone with these “analog players in a digital world” that matches at least our false memories of how cool it must have been to be around Sinatra and that bunch before they kicked your fucking teeth in. I’m smiling, I’m smiling! ”Ocean’s Thirteen opens Friday at over 3,150 locations.] [Ray Pride.]
Posted by Ray Pride at 09:59 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
June 04, 2007
Indie returns Wednesday [really!]
The view from here.
[Photo © 2007 Ray Pride.]
Posted by Ray Pride at 07:23 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack



