« Is this okay? | Main | Preston Sturges' Rules Of The Box Office »

March 31, 2005

One more Sin City thought...

I was in the book store today and looked through the "Yellow Bastard" graphic novel in the Sin City series. Amazing... intense... and emotional.

It is almost image for image, word for word, the same as the movie. But Miller's drawings say more.

I guess the answer, for me, is that there is something literal about film that isn't about most fine art. The edges of the images speak volumes... the jagged nature of them...

Here is a page that is duplicated in the film. It is just so much more powerful on paper.

And here is this rather smart film-to-comic comparison by FilmRot's Mediamelt.

Posted by poland at March 31, 2005 12:33 AM

Comments

obviously the books better than the movie. its the way it is. hopefully the movie can come close to it

Posted by: bicycle bob at March 31, 2005 06:32 AM

Having not seen Sin City, I'll reserve judgment. I suspect I will like it though (I was one of the few who enjoyed Once Upon a Time in Mexico). That being said, what's the point of doing a shot for shot recreation of the book? They are two different mediums. Films have the advantage of pulling us into the experience by incorporating music, speech, and motion. I hope none of these elements were sacrificed in order to achieve a visual match of something that already exists.

Posted by: Man With No Name at March 31, 2005 07:24 AM

Again, great point David. Sure, it's really neat to recreate an amazing comic book frame for frame onscreen but neat doesn't equal good.

Posted by: don at March 31, 2005 12:51 PM

I just don't see it crossing over to the general public. It will take a lot to be more than a one week wonder.

Posted by: Terence D at March 31, 2005 01:14 PM

It will make its money on week one. Anything less than a 40% drop off in week two has to be looked at as a success.

Posted by: Mark at March 31, 2005 02:26 PM

Uhh....the new blog is broken. I wrote what is credited to Man With No Name above, not the comment below that one...

Posted by: don at March 31, 2005 02:37 PM

Oh, wait. I'm a moron. I got it now....derrrrrrr. I think I need to go sit in a movie theater, vegging out and watching a 2 hour comic book movie ASAP!

Posted by: don at March 31, 2005 02:38 PM

Don't worry, don, I had the same thing happen to me. Just have to get used to name being below the message.

Posted by: Man With No Name at April 1, 2005 06:35 AM

the name below the message thing kinda weirds me out. forget my place when reading it

Posted by: bicycle bob at April 1, 2005 06:38 AM

The name has always been below the message, even on the old site. What's different now is the confusing new rule line between each name and each message. That line consistently gives the wrong impression that it's a separator between comments. Dave, if you want to keep that line as a design element, you should at least put the posted names above it.

Posted by: Chester at April 1, 2005 01:31 PM

Back to "Sin City." Every review I've seen has mentioned, the rampant violence and overall amorality of the film and its characters. With that as a given, I wonder if the death of the Pope, which is expected any second now, could noticeably affect box office receipts for this (or, for than matter, any other) film this weekend.

Posted by: Chester at April 1, 2005 02:31 PM

It was a pretty good movie. Good performances. Rourke was great. What has he been doing since the mid 90's? People that see it know what they're getting into. They just want a good story. No ones death is going to play a part in people seeing this. Only journalists and guys like Chet care.

Posted by: Mark at April 1, 2005 03:04 PM

Chester: The "All pope, all the time coverage" likely will transfix many of the faithful this weekend. (It's worth remembering that Catholicism is, hands down, the biggest single religious denomination in the U.S.) On the other hand, many people just as likely will go out to the movies just to get away from such... well, I was going to say overkill, but God might punish me for that, so let's just say, such ubiquitous coverage. I was 11 years old when JFK was killed, and I remember my aunt getting so fed up with the nonstop TV coverage that she decided to take me and my siblings out to see a movie. No kidding: On Nov. 22, 1963, I actually saw... "Dr. No."

Posted by: Joe Leydon at April 1, 2005 05:36 PM

As a Catholic I am deeply saddened by it. Thank God its natural causes and not something else. He went peacefully.

Posted by: Joe Fitz at April 2, 2005 12:32 PM

Saw the film last night visually it was great. The one complaint I have was that the Clive Owen/Rosario Dawson sequence was weak compared to the other two. It could have easily been removed. The Mickey Roarke and Bruce Willis sequences fit together nicely.

Posted by: teambanzai at April 2, 2005 02:23 PM

I know, it's only April. But here's my nominee for Bullshit B.O. Story of the Year, direct from BoxOfficeMojo.com, and linked -- surprise, surprise! -- on the Drudge Report website:

Moviegoers Living in 'Sin City'
by Brandon Gray
April 3, 2005


As news of Pope John Paul II's death dominated the weekend, moviegoers appear to have vindicated recent accusations that America is plagued by what religious radicals call a death culture—a charge lobbed by President George W. Bush in the wake of the Terry Schiavo case—by flocking to the ultra-violent Sin City.

Posted by: JoeLeydon at April 3, 2005 05:52 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?