« Crazy Site Of The Day | Main | Reviewing The Movie Or Your Life? »
August 18, 2005
Pay To Stay
Should the State of California, in the midst of a fiscal crisis that, for one thing, continues to deeply damage education, be throwing hundred of millions at the film industry to promote stay-at-home production?
The New York Times' David Halbfinger got a look at the proposed bill first.
And... as a small note... that seems petty even to me, but still makes me wonder... both films that are used as examples of projects that subsidies could help keep in California - Herbie: Fully Loaded and Wedding Crashers - were shot here in LA County. Wedding Crashers did 2 weeks on the Maryland shore both for incentives and because 2/3rds of film was set in the moneyed bay areas around Washington. Fact check!
But that is an aside. What do you think of CA paying for a higher percentage of production to stay here... especially in light if a shrinking Canadian runaway biz.
Posted by poland at August 18, 2005 09:22 PM
Comments
As someone with no kids but with lots of friends looking for production work...I'm in favor of it.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at August 18, 2005 09:34 PM
Hollywood, ie, California, was sliding along on habit and history for too long. The times, they changed. Whoopsie... California was left in the dust.
From the sound of the legislative proposal, this is a jobs support proposition, something to bring the California situation into the fiscal realities of the new millenia.
Hollywood has a great cinematic heritage, so in support of that and all the extisting expertise that will survive to work another day, I say, go for it. This seems like a wise investment.
Posted by: hatchling
at August 18, 2005 09:47 PM
I'm in favor of it. We're losing a lot of business to Canada here. We need to give more incentive to stay.
Posted by: Bruce
at August 18, 2005 09:57 PM
California has much bigger issues than losing a few movies to other sites.
Posted by: Mark Ziegler
at August 18, 2005 10:54 PM
Like what? Having a governor who has no idea what he's doing?
Posted by: Stella's Boy
at August 18, 2005 11:02 PM
More like too many years of Liberal control. Ha. Look what happens when a Republican has to clean up a Liberal mess. It's like cleaning up Chernobyl. Minus the whimsy.
Posted by: PandaBear
at August 18, 2005 11:04 PM
Yes, Chernobyl, Disney-like in its whimsy.
Stella, please don't inflame the nuts.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at August 18, 2005 11:06 PM
Jefster,
Was California under Liberal control for about two decades? How did Gray Davis do there? You got a Lefty state that elected a Conservative actor. That is how pissed they were at the Left for messing up their state. Left wing wackos should police there own bed. Because its mighty dirty.
Posted by: PandaBear
at August 18, 2005 11:20 PM
Sorry jeff. My bad.
Posted by: Stella's Boy
at August 18, 2005 11:24 PM
No California was not under Liberal control for two decades. California has had two Democrat governors in the past 38 years. And nobody screwed over California like Deukmejian and Wilson both Repulicans. Schwarzenegger was only elected on one issue the car tax, and the idiots that voted for him are regretting it now. Plus there's really nothing conservative about Scharzenegger he's only a Republican in name.
Posted by: teambanzai
at August 18, 2005 11:40 PM
Regardless of whose fault California's fiscal problems are, Schwarznegger has very low approval ratings and either won't run for reelection or will be defeated.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at August 19, 2005 12:00 AM
The subject... the subject....
Posted by: David Poland
at August 19, 2005 12:32 AM
You people elected the guy who couldn't speak more than 5 lines in Terminator. Give him a chance. He has heart. He just needs to cut thru the BS red tape that is the California legislature.
Posted by: joefitz84
at August 19, 2005 01:08 AM
California's a wreck of a state mainly due to too much immigration from illiterate, non-English speakers. The public school system? Used to be Top 5 in the country, now after too much immigration and the general disrepair of the sytem itself, it is bottom 5 in the country. Why so much traffic? Too many people. The power company shortages? Corrupt assholes at Enron and Too Many People. Why can't an average middle class family buy a house in California? Immigration, ridiculous zoning laws used by the rich to keep the poor away, wacko environmentalists restricting land use too much, etc, etc.
BTW California spends A LOT on the school system. In any other, state it would be more than enough. At some point you guys need to inquire more about where exactly the money goes. I bet most of it just gets eaten up unnecessary administration and bureaucrats. So long as Dems control the legislature, an army of bureaucrats who always remember to vote Dem will eat up most of the tax money that should be getting to the kids and schools.
Schwarzenegger's irrelevant. Why did anyone expect anything great in the first place? He's an action star. Or was.
Posted by: lindenen
at August 19, 2005 02:09 AM
The Pay to stay and pay to go (Incentives from other states) must be heating up.
Already Louisiana and Illinois have promised 60M capital funds for full production capability etc. Odd thing is both states have quoted the exact same capital costs for building the these facilities-competing for the same thing from California.
Most state film commissions have hit rock bottom in the last 10 yrs, but those few states putting a fortune in, might be losing more for their own state, unless bigger budget film production becomes Routine.
And now--California's bill. Now that several states have sold the family silver to get studios to Come On Down, how will this bill undercut them in endeavors to get moviemaking lured away from California?
I guess it depends on how badly Hollywood-ers want to stay in Hollywood.
So if the incentives bring millions into the state coffers I am ALL for it, but if it ends up Costing big...life in California for the average taxpayer footing the bill, will suck (more).
Posted by: Lota
at August 19, 2005 02:53 AM
You can't force people to work someplace but every incentive helps. The truth is its just cheaper sometimes to shoot in Vancouver or Toronto.
Posted by: Angelus21
at August 19, 2005 03:17 AM
"I bet most of it just gets eaten up unnecessary administration and bureaucrats" and huge insurance overheads--that's where most of it goes Lindenen.
don't blame the immigrants--they do all the min wage and half-min wage jobs that no one will do and the California economy depends on that type of labor more than any other state. George Bush sr tried to severely curtail the immigration of people from Mexico and central american countries (the quota) in 1991 and it was the only time in his tenure that the Ag and food lobbies didn;t support him. They would go bankrupt overnight, they screamed. Hispanic and Asian immigrants are Encouraged to go to California--there are ads everywhere on the home turf--mostly by corporate farming and hospitality industries etc becasue they know they can pay them 1/2 min (+tips) or min. I don't blame immigrants for going to the state that is most likely to employ them. That's what my non English-speaking grandparents on one side of the family did.
Like i said--If Ahnold's bill works, cool. If there are no real costs to the state up front, then it is worth the risk.
Posted by: Lota
at August 19, 2005 03:30 AM
Well, it's easy to tell who on this thread has never been to California before. Yes, middle-class Americans can live in California, as that is what 80% of California is consisted from. Yes, the education system is odd, not because of Democrats or Republicans, but because California is always the first to try out new methods, which are emulated down the road by other states.
You know a screwed up state? Forget California. Louisiana takes the cake. Everything is cheap (phone rates, health care) sure, but by that you have to remember that everything being cheap isn't always good. A terrible place to raise a family, and the weather is some of the worst around. This influx of movie productions from L.A. to LA would be mind-boggling if I knew it wasn't a flash in the pan. For this reason, I see the bill as a total waste.
Politicians don't need 'heart'. They need brains.
Posted by: AgentArc
at August 19, 2005 04:50 AM
Don't blame immigrants? How about illegal immigrants?
Posted by: joefitz84
at August 19, 2005 05:52 AM
"Well, it's easy to tell who on this thread has never been to California before. Yes, middle-class Americans can live in California, as that is what 80% of California is consisted from.
Yes, I have been to California! And I know it has a middle class, but are you really going to deny the extreme income segregation? Or the insane housing prices for an average middle class home? California has one of the highest costs of living which is why more Americans left California than moved to California last year. There's been a middle class exodus slowly bleeding out of California. If the current trends continue, California will end up mostly poor people with some rich people lording over them. Not good.
Yes, the education system is odd, not because of Democrats or Republicans, but because California is always the first to try out new methods, which are emulated down the road by other states."
Pssst. Education isn't difficult. What worked 100 years ago will work today. Kids were taught to read using the same methods 300 years ago as today. "New methods" seem to have really worked out since CA's schools have gone from the top 5 to the bottom 5 in the nation. You're now down near Mississippi and Louisiana! Does "odd" really mean "horrible"? A big part of what's wrong with the schools are "new methods". If they worked, why would they be "new"? We've been educating kids for hundreds of years and we used to do it much more competently. The human brain or genome didn't just magically transform into something new in the last twenty years necessitating new reading methods. BTW, yes, it is related to D versus R since the teacher's unions are rather left-wing as well as the people usually in charge of assigning reading programs, training teachers, etc.
Lota, in states without lots of illegals those jobs "Americans won't do" are done by Americans both white and black. The issue is how much they want to pay them, or don't want to pay them. I'm not sure why I should be eager to help corporate fatasses exploit poor people by not paying them at least minimum wage or higher. Before the large numbers of illegals, Americans managed to grow and pick their own food and still somehow afford to purchase it.
Also, I read recently that rice is actually grown in California. Rice cannot be grown without large amounts of water, so in a state with water problems, the federal government is actually underwriting the wasting of California's water to grow rice. RICE! Would it be better for most Californians if their water wasn't wasted growing rice? Yes! I still haven't gotten over it.
Posted by: lindenen
at August 19, 2005 06:21 AM
illegal is illegal Joefitz, and should be dealt with accordingly. Cocaine dealing is illegal yet is done publicly in finer establishments in LA, and many upscale businesses in LA "employ" illegal aliens through staffing agencies so they can claim to know nothing of their status. Laws are there, they are not enforced on well-to-do establishments or individuals except as a rare "example".
Illegal aliens rarely get into the US on their own steam these days--they are not the real problem--human traffickers and counterfeiters and greed for
Illegal is meaningless if the laws aren't enforced--and they aren't. California has alot of problems--part of which is their lack of enforcing stuff.
Posted by: Lota
at August 19, 2005 06:50 AM
Rice has been grown in California for a very long time, diverting lots of water from other states and other uses. Average Californians don't care--it has come up SO MANY times for over a decade. As long as the cable works, who cares about ag policy seems to be the attitude.
Posted by: Lota
at August 19, 2005 07:04 AM
lindenen, the middle-class squeeze is a nationwide issue. California has always been more expensive, and has always had a wealth of higher paying careers. However, now inflation across the nation is spreading like wildfire. Can't wait for the housing bubble to bust. That'll be a hoot!
Education methods from a 100 years ago didn't even work a 100 years ago. You throw kids into a overly lit room into broken seats at 7:00 in the morning and expect them to have rapt attention? Hell, 3/4 of my class dropped. Once they saw the classes they were attending would have no affect on their skills outside of school, they couldn't care. Countless programs have proven that career programs and later start times have kept kids in school and have had them go to college earlier. Like myself. Where was this discovered? California.
Teacher's Unions are always left-leaning. This would be a D vs R issue if this was happening all across the country, but the legislature has deemed Cali to be the ginuea pig of school systems since the days of Reagan.
Posted by: AgentArc
at August 19, 2005 01:58 PM
From movies to Cruise's sexuality to Native Americans to now illegal aliens and cocaine production. We got it all here.
Posted by: Bruce
at August 19, 2005 02:30 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)