The Hot Blog

Well they do need to stay competitive with The Post.

It is just another example of the "dumbing down of America." It is soon to be followed by the Washington Post and the WSJ doing articles on the financial vialbility of Jessica Simpson's ass.

"Honestly... How far is The NYTimes from covering L Lohan's breasts on a daily basis?"

In the name of ART!; and, to save the NYTimes integrity and lower DP's meds; I hereby volenteer to cover L Lohan's breasts on a daily basis. Ahhhhh....

This will sound like a joke, but I'm serious: How many people on this blog have actually seen "Devil in Miss Jones"? I don't mean: How many people have ever heard of it? I don't mean: How many have ever seen clips and/or photos from it? I mean: How many have actually seen the film, either in a theater or on home video?

Because if you have seen it, you may wonder the same thing I'm wondering: Would they dare use the same ending in a remake? Because... well, talk about something that can splash icy cold water on your sex fantasies!

I saw it on 16mm when I was 13 in the basement of a friends house. Twas a double feature with DDD. The film had a profound effect on me and I still vividly remember the ending as much as the oft heralded shock opening. Of course in recent times DIMJ Part 3 gets a lot more press due to many reasons - most unable to be mentioned here. A mighty piece of cinema either way, joining the Mitchell's GREEN DOOR and Poole's BOYS as pornographic masterpieces. I don't think the Vivid budget of $250k is total bullshit by any means... the budgets on some of these extravaganzas have been creeping up. Want a list of ones made for over $250k Dave? - for research only of course.

These days a $250k budget merely means that you're shooting on film and not on video, and still with a schedule that's merely short and not insane.

Seldom, if ever, does one get to say this to a fellow man. So let me be blunt; Dave, you dont know jack and shit about the porn industry. The industry that pulls in billions a year with a better profit margin than a Hollywood Exec or a Bollywood Exec could dream of. 250,000 on a porn, for Vivid, not that much money being spent at all. It's VIVID! VIVID! I really do know too much random knowledge. If knowing about the financial side of the porn industry.

"I really do know too much random knowledge." Rory doth protest too much for it to be Random.

So what's your name in the Trade Rory? "The Hedgehog"? "The Cannon"? "Tiny"? heh heh.

Wait, please don't really tell. I was just kidding.

There was a funny article in one of the UK dailies...The Guardian...or maybe the Independent where they said you could "make" your own porn name by taking the name of your first pet (your first name) and putting it with the name of your first car/motorcycle model (your last name).

So my name would be Daisy Dominator. Yee-hah!

Funny that you're "saddened" by NYT covering porn. I was just thinking it seems like every time I check MCN there's some uncomfortable-making sexual comment about teenage girls on it.

Jeez, Poland, relax. First of all, the NYT story is not a feature. it's two freaking paragraphs. second, get off your high horse already. go to the front page of MCN right now and there are links for various film-related stories that use the words "orgasm", "penis", "babe" and "masturbating." There is also an editorial comment wondering what Linda Carter's 14 year-old daughter looks like. Can you BE any bigger of a hypocrite?

To say that this sort of nonsense from the Times is OK because movie websites like MCN also do it is INSANE. They shouldn't have the same standards for content. Clearly, the "Paper of Record" is inching it's way towards the toilet paper dispenser.

"To say that this sort of nonsense from the Times is OK because movie websites like MCN also do it is INSANE."

I never said that. I was just pointing out Poland's hypocrisy.

"They shouldn't have the same standards for content."

Why not? If you're gonna throw stones.....

I wonder what Dr. Freud would make of David's obsessive love-hate relationship with the NYT? So he is "saddened" that the Times has sunk to the level of... MCN. Does that not speak of a certain -- gee, I dunno, self-hatred?

That's OK, David: We love you anyway. So go ahead and write another piece about hot actresses you'd like to breed with. Let the good times (and the Colt 45) flow.

Hilarious. The guy who's obsessed with teenage girls is criticizing the Times for a one page story on the porn industry during a slow news week. Unbelievable.

Explore here the erotic lifestyle of millions of people through our Nude Photos and thousands of sexy webcam videos.

Great find. Pornography and Phone Sex Services are big business these day.

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

URL:
Remember me? YesNo

Comments: