« When Critics Are Selling Shit | Main | Sunday Estimates - November 13 »

November 13, 2005

Tomorrow's NYT Corrections Today

You got my Mexican in my Columbian! You gor my actor in my director!

How many non-Americans does it take to make the NYT editors (and by extension, all American media) look like ignorant gringos? Apparently two.

"One of next year's high-profile films is Alejandro González Iñárritu's "Babel," which stars an international cast headed by Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett and Gael García Bernal in four separate stories set in Mexico, the United States, North Africa and Japan."

"Rodrigo García's "Nine Lives," with Glenn Close, Holly Hunter and Sissy Spacek, consists of nine discrete stories, each running 10 to 15 minutes."

"In fashioning "Nine Lives," Mr. García Bernal recognized that audiences might be reluctant to keep reinvesting in a brand new cast of characters."

"Mr. García Bernal has directed episodes of 'Six Feet Under' and 'The Sopranos.'Mr. Haggis got his start writing for shows like "L.A. Law."

"Acknowledging that overlapping plots have become a formula on television, Mr. García suggested: 'Maybe these multiple story lines are just a symptom of our impatience. That could be the downside of this trend.'"

"Mr. García Bernal noted. 'But people have to feel they belong together.'"

Uh...huhuhuh... huhuhuhuh... he said "Garcia"... Uh...huhuhuh... huhuhuhuh

(Thx to Beavis, Butthead & Nate)

Posted by poland at November 13, 2005 10:34 AM

Comments

Rented Crash last night. Lob me in the nay column. Haggis is really a lazy storyteller, relying on coinicidence and "plants" to get the plot moving. Every little stupid thing leads to something else. It's frustrating to watch scenes at the beginning be so blatantly (maybe romantically is the word) racial, leading you to wonder where he's going with it, until it's obvious he's guiding us to more scenes just like it. Then he ties it all neatly in a bow at the end declaring: "prejudice is really about fear folks." I guess you can get away with liking it, though it doesn't take chances enough to even fail honestly. Kind of cowardly.

Like Million Dollar Baby, I strongly disagree with the politics of the drama, teasing you with hope then throwing it's hands up in the end saying "oh those crazy racist!" (Haggis' invention of Clint's wrongheaded priest pal and Hilary's Jethro Bodine-esque family makes more sense now).

Crash is a very artless art movie.

Posted by: Crow T Robot [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2005 11:19 AM

Agreed. Hagiss is a very overrated filmmaker/writer. Sadly, his 'correct' politics allows for critics to be very kind. MDB is a good film for the first 2 thirds but a mediocre one in the final stretch.

From the sterotypical 'hicksville' parent to the Catholic priest who knows nothing about Catholicism to the total absence of medical fact (it would never play out as it did in this film)this film was not Clint's best.

Funny, some people though that the anti-euthanasia side didn't get enough play...truth be told no side got enough. No, the priest is not given very good arguments but then again..."Put me down like a dawg," isn't exactly the most compelling argument for assisted suicide I've ever heard.

As for Crash, I think it is stuck in that typical 'big city white guilt' view of racism. I'd like to see the movie about racsm that Bill Cosby would make. That would make for compelling viewing and tell us something we hadn't heard before. This was simply stuck in the 60's.

Posted by: Nicol D [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2005 01:51 PM

I don't know about 60s, it was pretty far removed from the fairly naive Guess Who's Coming To Dinner view of the world. I would say it was stuck in the 90s worldview post-Short Cuts and Magnolia. But I agree that it was clumsy and only succeeded by pushing the right buttons.

Posted by: jeffmcm [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2005 02:05 PM

I can't remember seeing a less subtle movie than Crash. Every time a character would walk into a scene it would turn into a Lenny Bruce routine. Reminded me of how good Magnolia was... I'll take frogs falling in the valley over snow anytime.

And how about Tony Danza as the racially shallow producer! What the fuck was that? Couldn't they get Alan Thicke?

Posted by: Crow T Robot [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2005 04:12 PM

Crash is a movie of the week. I don't need to be preached at for two hours especially about racism.

Posted by: Angelus21 [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2005 06:27 PM

Paul Haggis is the new Douglas Sirk

Posted by: Scooba Steve [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2005 06:54 PM

"relying on coinicidence"

Hah. Every single movie that falls into the genre of Crash (the intercut storyline type), as well as thrillers and romantic comedies and the like all rely of coincidences.

I personally really liked Crash. And while it's intentions are admirable, they're not why I liked it so much (but it appears to be exactly why people dislike it). It was extremely well acted, technically it was great (cinematography, score, etc all excellent), and it had some great moments (singular scenes are work tremendously well). The screenplay is a little bit "HI, MY NAME IS RACISM AND I AM IN YOUR LIFE!!!!!" but it didn't annoy me as much in my second viewing, except for whenever Ludicris is on screen.

Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0 [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2005 10:22 PM

Oh, god, Douglas Sirk is a million times better of a director than Haggis (so far). Sirk's best movies are subtle, ironic, and subversive. Crash is all surface.

I dislike Crash, but its intentions are admirable, it's the execution where the movie fails for me. Who's saying that it's intentions are why they don't like it?

Posted by: jeffmcm [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2005 11:24 PM

hes against racism. thanks paul haggis. really cutting edge.

Posted by: bicycle bob [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 14, 2005 08:38 AM

Crash was kind of sad. I think a movie like Crash needs to be made. A movie that deals with racism in America because so many other movies just glance over it and that's wrong. But Crash is not the answer I was looking for.

Yes, the intenions are good and the standards are really high. But I was just sick of the movie by the halfway mark. Just sick of it.

Posted by: Hopscotch [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 14, 2005 11:41 AM

Crash doesn't have to be made today. Maybe on the Lifetime network.

Posted by: Bruce [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 14, 2005 02:33 PM

Why doesn't Crash need to be made today? Because it's not a good movie or because we don't need movies about racism?

Posted by: Stella's Boy [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 14, 2005 02:45 PM

Crash was one of the worst movies of the year. I think anyone touting it for awards hasn't seen it or has white mans guilt.

Posted by: joefitz84 [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 14, 2005 04:35 PM

When the SUV's gasoline trickled down the street toward the flaming car, I half expected Mel Gibson to walk over and throw a hacksaw to poor Thandie Newton.

"Now it'll take ya ten minutes to cut through the metal but five to go through the bone. It's your call, mate."

(Sorry, I'm enjoying hating this movie. It's my new Serenity)

Posted by: Crow T Robot [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 15, 2005 06:50 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?