« Logo A Go Go | Main | First Look: Travolta Tries Out His Edna Turnblad Make-Up »
July 31, 2006
Checking Out On Gibson
After three days of this, I have made the decision - on the MCN side, along with my partner, Laura - to get out of the Mel Gibson DUI business until there is actual news and not just a bunch of people looking for someone else to quote for the next "EXCLUSIVE."
I have made my position clear. I will respond as appropriate to the blog comments on existing entries. But enough is enough. (I've already written too much, really.) How much longer before we get David Hasselhoff and Danny Bonaduce on record EXCLUSIVEly on this incident?
I can't really scream about all the shit kicking going on today because I have been a part of it. So, in a few days, my shoes may be clean, even if there is still some shit embedded in my soles. (Or is that soul?)
I wondered in The Hot Button today about all these media pieces fit together. And now, by instinct, I have my answer.
We have seen the enemy... and it is ourselves.
We in the media have too often become like children who won't stop eating the candy until the cupboard is empty or we throw up. I just threw up.
ADDED, 12:08a, 8/1 - Anne Thompson takes an honorable position on stopping the madness
ADDED, 12:18a, 8/1 - Proud moment for Slate... a serious web magazine...

Posted by poland at July 31, 2006 12:38 PM
Comments
These considerations are why I respect and return to you, Dave.
Posted by: Campbell
at July 31, 2006 12:58 PM
I think the only new news for this story is how the negative backlash will affect the roll out plans for Apocalyto. Aside from that, it'll all be outrage, mea culpas and tongue lashings. Tiresome.
Posted by: Wrecktum
at July 31, 2006 03:41 PM
Was any of this really "news" in the first place? Didn't affect my day beyond a quick chuckle over the weekend.
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley
at July 31, 2006 04:16 PM
I'd say it's news when a respected and wealthy artist goes apeshit and reveals himself as something of a racist. But I guess it depends on your definition of 'news'. It won't raise the price of oil any, for example, which is all that people are concerned about in the Middle East.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at July 31, 2006 04:24 PM
Well what can I say? If it's simply that Gibson is famous that you're going to consider it "news," that doesn't compute for me. That's pretty much hop-skotching the fact that all it is is "gossip." The story broke on a gossip site after all, and now that site is being glorified here and there as "breaking" something of substance. So Harvey Levin is a lawyer with, assuredly, ties to the LA Sheriff's Department. Good call on having a nice source, but whatEVER.
Just because someone is a famous bigot doesn't mean they matter more than the next bigot. They don't to me anyway, but then I don't own the press.
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley
at July 31, 2006 04:33 PM
Ah, but the difference is that this is a bigot who has had years of success and influence in determining what goes into peoples' heads. Gibson matters a lot more than the guy on the street corner raving about Jews to himself and the five passersby he meets.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at July 31, 2006 04:41 PM
If anyone "lets" something go into their heads because someone is pointing a camera at something, they deserve whatever's coming to them.
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley
at July 31, 2006 04:44 PM
I don't think most movie/TV watchers are that savvy and aware about what they're consuming.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at July 31, 2006 04:47 PM
I also don't think that Gibson's body of work has been overtly bigoted enough to influence what's going on in peoples' heads.
Posted by: Wrecktum
at July 31, 2006 05:01 PM
That's probably correct, although just because something isn't overtly and obviously racist, there can still be subtle reinforcement of peoples' beliefs (i.e. the fag-bashing in Braveheart).
Posted by: jeffmcm
at July 31, 2006 05:07 PM
How is Gibson's arrest not legitimate news -- hilarious legitimate news?! First there's his father; then there's "Passion of the Christ" -- a whole history of denials of anti-semitism in his life and in his work. And then he gets arrested, drunk, and what does he say?
I look at it the same way I look at public figures (politicans, religious leaders) who are gay. It's not relevant -- unless they're speaking out against gay civil rights. There's a streak of bigotry running through Gibson's films -- he's always denied it. But now it's on record, with police officers as witnesses. This is called karma, payback. And it's news.
Posted by: jim emerson
at July 31, 2006 11:50 PM
I think the arrest was news, the language was news, the comment from Disney was news, the cancellation of the TV movie was news...
What isn't news, in my opinion, is the endless minor points made by people jockeying for position. And that is why we have posted two more stories since this went up... and why we won't be doing daily round-ups of every silly little position paper on the issue.
Posted by: David Poland
at July 31, 2006 11:54 PM
While I think it's honorable to stay out of this one, I also don't think that Mel Gibson should be allowed a free ride on this. Granted, the guy is one of the most powerful men in Hollywood, but no one should be allowed to be as beligerent and openly racist as he obviously is, especially after the denials of anti-Semitism in Passion (which for my money was fairly insulting to the Jewish race).
The Jewish junkies in rehab will get their revenge in the showers, I'm sure.
Posted by: EDouglas
at August 1, 2006 05:02 AM
It is legitimate news. A star getting arrested is legit news. It's not war. It's not murder but it is certainly newsworthy.
Posted by: Richard Nash
at August 1, 2006 02:34 PM
The NEWS is legitimate news.
The GOSSIP is not legitimate news.
The arrest, the career issue, the apologies... all news.
Eveyrone's opinion and jokes... not news.
Posted by: David Poland
at August 1, 2006 03:26 PM
Mel's apology was accepted by Foxman. Now, if he didn't issue the second apology, he'd probably still be in deep water, but it seems that there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Hollywood needs Mel more than he needs them.
Posted by: palmtree
at August 1, 2006 03:33 PM
thanks for letting me know about the second apology [Palmtree] (didn;t read any news today). went & read it, and whew, maybe Mel has hit rock bottom, realized he was the Grinch with a heart three-sizes too small, and maybe really will reform enough we see less "Passion" politics, more Road Warrior (but Dry).
Posted by: Lota
at August 1, 2006 10:09 PM
Oh man, it's just disgusting the way the cable news channels are regurgitating this thing with talking heads for ratings.
MSNBC is just offensive with it.
It is a testament to the power of celebrity, I guess. Or maybe more to the idea, that Mel is seems to be one of the last great 'Movie Stars' we have/had and (not to mention that little Jesus movie he made) so his cultural capital carries more weight than say if Jamie Foxx committed the same offense?
I didn't really expect this story to get this grossly big. If the media keeps bludgeniong us with it, the backlash against Mel might turn back to his favor?
Also, if Mel is the alchoholic they say he is, then I imagine he was pretty blacked out when all this happend. If I was his PR people, I would be hammering home how damagin alchoholism is, and what a blackout really is, and how he really had no clue what he was saying/doing.
A blackout does not excuse the emotional underpinnings that made Gibson make those comments, but anyone that has suffered with real alchoholism in their family knows that when someone is experiencing a true blackout, there is no formative lucidity, logic, rationality or any kind of upper conscious thinking skills at work.
Nope, that person is really checked out, and pure unadulterated negative emotions are running rampant.
That's the damage control angle I'd be pushing if I were Gibson's people.
And with that, I'm done with this one too.
Posted by: THX5334
at August 2, 2006 03:45 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)