« Video Of The Day - 8/20 - Next Door | Main | Snake Bit? »
August 20, 2006
Jeffrey Wells Update
As most of you know, Jeffrey Wells is not my favorite journalist and is often not my favorite person... but he is a human being. And I know some of you read him.
I'm sure he will explain the whole story tomorrow on his blog, but he is ok. The hospital he is at has no internet access, which is why he hasn’t updated since yesterday. He was in some danger of an escalated problem from his blood poisoning, but they have it under control and he expects to be released (and back to work) on Monday morning.
I wish him the best of health and a quick exit from the ranks of entertainment journalists to become a crusader for better health care.
Posted by poland at August 20, 2006 08:24 PM
Comments
Best backhanded 'Get Well Soon!' ever?
Posted by: Tofu
at August 20, 2006 09:04 PM
I don't think Jeff would want sentimentality here. Saturday, somehow he was able to blog in the morning, saying, "The worst of it had passed by this morning, thank fortune, but if I'd been stuck out in the desert somewhere and beyond of the reach of good medicine..." elipses (dot, dot, dot) his own. He's opened the door, David walked through. You have to see it as a dance. I don't know of any other blog that bothered to post an update on his condition -- that says more to me than the swipe.
Posted by: T.H.Ung
at August 20, 2006 09:20 PM
I'm sure Jeff will have something to say about that last comment - it was pretty funny, and I like the guy!
Posted by: Aladdin Sane
at August 20, 2006 09:40 PM
Yeah Sane, I think poison blood Jeff would like nothing more than a few jabs. I'd love it if he posts his final bill, but careful with the exacto knife. Hope he throws that cursed thing away.
Posted by: T.H.Ung
at August 20, 2006 10:23 PM
I'm surprised he didn't post any photos of his infected hand on his site.
"Poison Blood Jeff" is an awesome nickname.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at August 21, 2006 12:27 AM
That is a very classy post, David (and I'm being serious, not sarcastic--I know how hard it is to tell with me sometimes)... between that and the high ground you took with reporting this weekend's box office--which IMO is too close to call--I think that you've decided to follow your own advice from last week's Lunch with David.
It's not always easy or fun to say something nice to or about someone who you don't always like or get along with, but I've found that very often, it's the better road to take, because it lets you sleep better at night. If they don't appreciate your kind thoughts or words, then you know that you've done what you can to try to be civil and any problems are less your fault.
I hope that this is the first step to you and Jeffrey trying to get along.
Posted by: EDouglas
at August 21, 2006 02:43 AM
Then again I read this wrong:
"I wish him the best of health and a quick exit from the ranks of entertainment journalists to become a crusader for better health care. "
But still, at least part of the sentiment was there. :)
Posted by: EDouglas
at August 21, 2006 03:57 AM
No matter how Dave's post is worded, we know he is a decent, compassionate guy.
It's still a classy post.
/toasts Fijian Wrestler
Posted by: Spacesheik
at August 21, 2006 04:33 AM
"I'm surprised he didn't post any photos of his infected hand on his site."
The week is young... Expect those and creepy pictures of the nurses' feet fairly soon.
Posted by: Josh Massey
at August 21, 2006 05:51 AM
Did he get bit by a snake? On a plane?
Posted by: TJFar67
at August 21, 2006 07:14 AM
EDouglas, you were right, it is classy AND deceptively flat, void of emotion, it opens with a hammer swing and quickly pulls the humanity punch, and the last sentence needs a second read to feel the pain, the blood poisoning is wicked, and the whole thing is amusingly counter intuitive to Jeff's high falutent condescending writing. Which is why I like both, I love when Wells says David has written a heart piece.
I tried calling Cedar's Sinai Hospital yesterday myself, but I'd never know what code name Jeff checked in under, so the opertor said piss off. Maybe I should have tried Kaiser Permanente Hospital anyway. When Jeff said stuck in the desert, I know he meant he was grateful to be in the hospital getting attention, but my mind went to our own Twenty-Nine Palms and the high desert, where every emergency room and hospital's been closed for miles and miles.
Posted by: T.H.Ung
at August 21, 2006 07:34 AM
Hey, Dave, nice post. I got rid of all my other time-wasting movie biz bookmarks and just kept you and Jeff. And I feel sorry about Jeff's stolen bicycle, too.
BTW, on another topic: You linked to a piece about Indy IV, where Lucas says he finally discovered a "McGuffin" he can use. Does he not even know what a McGuffin is? It's an item that presents itself as being essential to the plot but is irrelevant in the long run, like the briefcase in Pulp Fiction. When did an Indy film ever have a McGuffin? All the items -- the Ark, the Grail, etc. -- were all central and remained so. The Indy films were never clever enough to actually use a McGuffin.
Posted by: Mr. Muckle
at August 21, 2006 07:49 AM
Mr. Muckle, can't a McGuffin also refer to an object that supposedly drives the plot but is really just an excuse to catalyze action/chases/derring-do? (For example, getting the rabbit's foot is technically plot-central throughout Mission: Impossible III, but it's hard to see it as anything other than a McGuffin.) Put it another way: to most people, is Raiders of the Lost Ark "the one where they find the lost ark of the convenant" or "the one with the kickass truck chase, the part where Indy shoots the swordsman, and the part where he has to go into the cave with snakes," etc.?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the term "McGuffin" but I don't think it's exclusively a decoy item.
Posted by: jesse
at August 21, 2006 08:23 AM
yeah, you're probably right, jesse. oh well. I was under the impression that Hitchcock coined the expression, but I'm no historian. No doubt, Lucas knows what he's talking about -- but he has also forgotten how to make a good movie, imo. Ha ha ha.
Posted by: Mr. Muckle
at August 21, 2006 08:48 AM
He Did. And in a sense, you're both right.
Posted by: THX5334
at August 21, 2006 09:26 AM
That's interesting, the McGuffin thing does seem to have gone soft. The jelly half (JW) of the peanut butter (DP) & jelly sandwich had it much worse than I ever could have imagined. What did peanut butter do, track jelly down on cell, or work the journalistic friends network.
Posted by: T.H.Ung
at August 21, 2006 10:20 AM
http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/archives/2006/08/getting_well_so.php
Wells has responded.
Posted by: palmtree
at August 22, 2006 10:07 AM
Taking the high road. How uncharacteristic of him.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at August 22, 2006 11:07 AM
Personal attack posts get a lot of traffic. So do Mel posts -- Jelly's (JW) attack on Peanut Butter (DP) and the Mel post are really companion pieces.
Posted by: T.H.Ung
at August 22, 2006 12:00 PM
A few days later, but I lost interest in Hot Blog for awhile when it became POTC vs SR vs X3 24/7 for awhile there. However, this fairly demands a rebuke...
Poland, you start off fine, deciding to be honest and not hide your differences with Wells ("As most of you know, Jeffrey Wells is not my favorite journalist and is often not my favorite person... but he is a human being. And I know some of you read him.").
Fine and even bravo.
But then, it seems the lessen you failed to learn last year with the ebay bid thing is back this year, namely knowing when to stop and say no more. It takes your somewhat classy/quasi-high road (I write this because you lead with your feelings about him instead of the observation that he is a human being and fellow commentator on things cinematic).
You apparently just couldn't stop your fucking fingers from adding "I wish him the best of health and a quick exit from the ranks of entertainment journalists..."
It really makes you look scummy.
And considering some of the complete morons and petty, pompous airheads to be found stuffing their faces at junkets who call themselves "entertainment journalists" it also seems gratuitous. While some of his pieces leave me cold and lord knows I have had my own personal issues with him, Wells writes with intelligence and passion about films made with intelligence and passion.
Posted by: RoyBatty
at August 24, 2006 10:45 AM
Heaven and Earth are impartial;
they treat all of creation as straw dogs.
The Master doesn't take sides;
she treats everyone like a straw dog.
Posted by: T.H.Ung
at August 24, 2006 12:22 PM
In the wake of looking for RoyBatty, I'm thinking of going un-anon.
Posted by: T.H.Ung
at August 24, 2006 05:18 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)