« Friday Box Office by Mojo | Main | TIFF Saturday Shorts »

September 09, 2006

BORAT II

It’s rare that a sequel is better than the original and Friday night’s second midnight premiere of Borat was that, if only because the film ran from start to finish.

The downside was that Borat himself made no appearance on Friday night, leaving the larger crowd at the Elgin (the first TIFF midnight show to appear at that venue) a little frustrated.

The evening started with some rain, leaving the crowd standing on Yonge Street for more than 30 minutes getting wet. The smell of wet dog was pervasive as they finally entered the auditorium, but it finally passed.

Joining Michael Moore and the celebrities from Thursday night were Dustin Hoffman and Harvey Weinstein. This would prove to be ironic as the aforementioned Midnight Cowboy reference was even funnier for me... and even less acknowledged by an audience that had seen it once before.

But don’t get me wrong. It was a rock-n-roll crowd for the film, with people screaming, singing, and chanting before the film. Larry Charles kicked off the screening with a “Are you ready for a rowdy, raucous, subversive movie?!?!?!” The crowd screamed affirmatively and we were off.

The movie is still, even on third viewing, sheer genius.

I got to argue later in the evening about Sasha Baron Cohen’s Oscar chances in the Best Actor category and I tell you, his work here is not just some comic role that The Academy tends to overlook. This is, in its raw way, Chaplin or Tati. Cohen brings sympathy, empathy, innocence, and unbridled passion to the role amongst the loads of utter insanity. Actors vote for actors. And unlike any other comic role in memory, this is a real one-man show. No actor will take control of you in a movie this year any more profoundly than Cohen. And to overlook him in the name of expectation would be pathetic.

Posted by poland at September 9, 2006 04:17 PM

Comments

I would remind you that Chaplin and Tati won zero competitive Oscars for Best Actor. The Academy overlooks comic acting and they also overlook genius. And it sounds like this will fall into both of those categories.

Posted by: jeffmcm [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 9, 2006 04:38 PM

Could this go down as another one of Dave's dubious Oscar picks? Magic 8 Ball says, Signs point to yes.

Posted by: Blackcloud [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 9, 2006 06:18 PM

David, as much as it pains me to say this...you may be right about Borat. My 70+ year old mother just Emailed me to ask if I knew when it was playing down in her area... I was floored, because I couldn't imagine this playing for older audiences... maybe I'm wrong on this.

Posted by: EDouglas [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 9, 2006 06:33 PM

I should correct that... right about the movie and its appeal. I won't agree with you on the acting nomination. I just don't see it happening. Golden Globe? Yeah, definitely...but there's a lot more at play here, and as you say, actors vote for actors... Cohen is seen as a comic and not an actor who has paid his dues... he had a good performance in Madagascar and Talladega Nights, but it's not like Johnny Depp, who surprised a lot of people with his Pirates nom.

Anyway, can't wait to see him be #1 in David's acting chart... I loved how World Trade Center dropped from 1 to 8 for Best Picture. Welcome back to reality :)

Posted by: EDouglas [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 9, 2006 06:37 PM

Both of my parents are looking forward to this, and they're in their mid-50s. I had shown my mom some Ali G and Borat clips online awhile ago...It took her a few minutes to clue into the conceit of Borat, but afterwards she loved it.
My dad is a lot more conservative in his likes when it comes to that sort of comedy, and I showed him the trailer to Borat and he loved it. He went home and told my mom. Needless to say, they're making an effort to see it when it comes out.

Posted by: Aladdin Sane [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 9, 2006 08:47 PM

I find the Borat 'phenom' interesting. Ali G made Cohen famous yet the Ali G feature went straight to video in North America and his secondary character of Borat will push him over the top.

Much like Rowan Atkinson who came to light with Blackadder (whom many still do not know) but his secondary character of Mr. Bean is what put him over on this side of the pond.

Just interesting.

Posted by: Nicol D [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 9, 2006 10:14 PM

Blackadder is a gazillion times funnier than Mr. Bean.

I'm pretty sure the Ali G movie did get a theatrical release in the States. It only lasted about an hour, but nonetheless it was in theaters. They did have Ali G in a commercial with Kobe Bryant, so he can't be totally unknown.

Posted by: Blackcloud [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 9, 2006 11:34 PM

Blackadder is also significantly more British than Mr. Bean ever was, therefore wouldn't travel as well.

Posted by: jeffmcm [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 10, 2006 01:01 AM

The thing with SBC I think is, is that if people LIKE him they could very well vote for him.

There's an Australian movie out atm called Kenny, a mockumentary about a portable toilet plumber and while the performance by Shane Jacobson as Kenny isn't anything extremely powerful or whathaveyou, people genuinely love the character and such and so he's a sinch for a Best Actor nod come our awards time. And I could see the same happening to Cohen.

Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0 [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 10, 2006 01:06 AM

DP didn't mention the sound problems Moore had later. Maybe he split.

From HR: "Moore endured a faulty sound system at the Elgin Theatre on Friday night as he attempted to show clips from 'Slacker Uprising,' a film he did on the aftermath of the 2004 U.S. election.... After technicians solved the problem, Moore was able to show clips from 'Sicko,' his expose of the U.S. health insurance industry that is slated for release in June 2007.... This followed a broken projector on Thursday night canceling a 20th Century Fox screening for the Sacha Baron Cohen-starrer 'Borat'.... 'This is last night all over again,' a frustrated Moore told Charles on stage as technicians struggled to fix the sound system so he could show clips from his latest projects."

Posted by: T.H.Ung [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 10, 2006 12:46 PM

Can anybody explain why Michael Moore get to show clips of his stuff in front of completely unrelated movies that he had no involvement in?

Posted by: jeffmcm [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 10, 2006 01:47 PM

I don't know, but Moore q-n-a'ed Charles after the screening. That's when the Moore preview mini film fest took place according to my reading of the HR piece I quoted from.

Posted by: T.H.Ung [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 10, 2006 02:43 PM

Jeff, that's a legit question and it goes to show the level of journalism going on at Toronto this yr. I've never heard of directors getting invited to the festival to just show a few clips of movies they're working on. If the writers were a little less lazy, they'd be balancing their stories with info on how Moore's presentation fits into the rest of the fest.

Posted by: martin [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 10, 2006 03:14 PM

Well I guess in the abstract a director showing clips of his film at a fest is not totally out of whack. Stone previewed WTC at Cannes with only 20 minutes and I believe other director's have there too.

I'm sure only major directors would be alowed to do so. Then the real debate would focus on is Michael Moore a major enough director and how do you define that.

Given the overt left-wing nature of many of the films at TO this year, it would seem Moore would fit in just fine.

As for journos not asking tougher questions, I do agree. It seems more and more that many entertainment journos aren't much different than the 'starfuckers' waiting to catch a glimpse of Brad Pitt coming out of the Four Seasons. Lots of kissy-kissy-aren't-you-a-genius type questions.

I used to love watching the press conferences to the TIFF and Cannes etc, but it seems in recent years too many journos just kiss up to the talent.

As for the sound breakdown...again, the Elgin is not a real movie theatre so the breakdown there is not terribly surprising. I guess the sound system was Sicko.

Posted by: Nicol D [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 11, 2006 07:19 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?