« Change Of Name | Main | Note... »
October 23, 2006
Borat Redux
For the sake of clarity….
Borat will open on just 800 screens on November 3 (the official release will soon hit the wires), so they are trying to do an expansion release. But it will not be a traditional platform. They are claling it a "Tiered Release." There is a plan, even if Fox won’t say exactly what their expectations are. And they don’t have to.
Without recounting my concerns about the length of the engagement for the film, the actual strategy of platforming – even aggressively – in November is risky or groundbreaking (depending on how it goes). For openings under 1250 screens in November, only five have ever cracked $10 million on opening weekend in box office history. None in the last 14 years.
Misery on 1244 did $10.1m
Cape Fear on 924 did $10.3m
Three Men & A Baby on 1004 did $10.4m
Home Alone on 1202 did $17.1m
Aladdin on 1131 did $19.3m
Three of the films were massive smash hits. Two did well (Misery did $61m and Cape Fear did $79m)
There are also two other films that loom as significant. Beauty & The Beast did $9.6 million on 977 screens before making $146 million.
But the one that more realistic fits in Fox’s plans is Steel Magnolias, which opened to $7.1 million on 720 screens and ended up with $84 million domestic.
So here is my idea of a reasonable expectation… that might not be so unreasonable. Unlike some crazy former journalist who gets 100% of her box office insight from a studio competing with Fox, I would not say the slotting against other films has anything to do with success.
There have been seven R rated films that have done more than $10,000 per screen on opening weekend in the month of November.
8 Mile - $20,745 on 2470
Interview With The Vampire - $13,975 on 2604
The Matrix Revolutions - $13,842 on 3502
Ransom - $12,786 on 2676
Bram Stoker’s Dracula - $12,252 on 2491
Jarhead - $11,499 on 2411
Cape Fear - $11,105 on 924
You will notice that there a lot of big stars involved, except for Jarhead, which interestingly was the only one release on the first weekend of the month. And that is really the answer here.
As long as Borat does $8 million - $11 million on opening weekend, they are well inside their plan. If for whatever reason, it gets to $15 million or more, that would be a huge win for Fox.
After that, I expect that the hope is to get to 2000 screens by Thanksgiving weekend and a $25 million 5-day, totaling around $50 million, with the focus on cruising to $85 million or so by the new year. If it’s bigger than that, they’ll be thrilled. If it’s $75 million or better, they will be okay with it.
And so it goes…
Posted by poland at October 23, 2006 09:15 PM
Comments
And there, ladies and gentlemen, is the world's first - and only - attempt to tie "Borat" and "Steel Magnolias" together!
Posted by: Josh Massey
at October 23, 2006 09:52 PM
Did they have to cut a lot of shots in order to make it a R?
Posted by: Teh Awesome
at October 23, 2006 11:15 PM
Um, "Steel Magnolias" is a bit dated comparison don't you think? The movie marketing business has changed a great deal since then and most of those flicks aren't accurate comparisons. But it would be hard to imagine them having a lower per screen than "Marie Antoinette" did this past weekend in a similar number of theaters. $50 million though? Might be a reach.
Posted by: wholovesya
at October 23, 2006 11:28 PM
It doesn't matter what the opening frame performance for Borat is.
People like you and other "HOLLYWOOD BLOGGERS" have been covering this film obsessively for far too long. If it earns less than whatever you expect, you'll call it a "disappointment" and stomp all over it for a week or two and then bring it up every time something that's marketed in a similar way isn't as popular or profitable as you thought it would be.
And it's annoying and completely cheap and boring, and it's all you seem to be capable of. You're desperate to be part of the system yet you're shunned from it, so you appeal to its baser instincts and act like your proclimations of "failure" or "success" mean anything at all to anyone.
It's frankly disgustingly unhip to sit there and try to act like this film HAD BETTER LIVE UP TO EXPECTATIONS!!. You're talking about a film that is targetted toward people who are familiar with Cohen's routine, college kids, some high schoolers and the occasional boomer who is savvy to Cohen's shtick. That's it.
In short: nobody gives a shit what you think about "Borat" or its box office prospects, David Poland.
Christ.
Posted by: Zac Bertschy
at October 24, 2006 12:14 AM
Watch out for those cheap boring proclimations, KIDZ. What expectations? This thing is darn funny. Let's see how far darn funny takes us next week...
Posted by: prideray
at October 24, 2006 12:33 AM
Nice hissy fit, Zac. Sorry you are so very angry.
You're awfully upset about something no one gives a shit about. Might want to check into that.
Posted by: David Poland
at October 24, 2006 01:24 AM
Awesome... according to the studio, they were shocked when the MPAA asked for no cuts and gave it the R.
Posted by: David Poland
at October 24, 2006 01:34 AM
hehehe! Borat doesn't come out in the US until the 3rd of Nov? How I love being in a country with new releases on Wednesdays!!! Borat hits Belgium on Nov 1st!!! Hmmm... should be a good watching when recouping from Halloween fiesta hangover!
I hadn't really considered watching this movie... I'm not sure it will translate well (to french), but you all are so passionate about it I might just have to see what all the fuss is about!
And Dave... you still haven't said why you found Perfume entertaining!!! I just don't get it!!! (and I've both read the novel and seen the film)
Posted by: crazycris
at October 24, 2006 04:05 AM
David, I compared the tracking for Borat to that of Dave Chappelle's Block Party in the same week before period. Average awareness for Borat is HALF that of DCBP... and that's despite all the San Diego, Cannes, Toronto, MySpace screenings...the first choice percentage among guys under 25 is also lower than that of DCBP as are all the other numbers.
Now go see what Dave Chappelle's movie made opening weekend and rethink this unrealistic scenario you've layed out for the movie.
I mean, c'mon... Steel Magnolias?!? And you have the nerve to fling stones at other journalists and call them crazy?
Borat will probably make $7-9 million its opening weekend and blow its load in the cities/college towns to cut off any expansion at the knees.
Maybe you and the frat boys find sexist and racist jokes to be funny, but Borat seems like a one trick pony to me from what I've seen... and it's a trick already done by Andy Kaufman and Bronson Pinchot without being nearly as offensive to women and Jews.
But I guess anti-Semitism is the big thing these days...oh, unless of course you're Mel Gibson. (Wasn't he and Fox partners for a number of years? Very interesting...)
Posted by: EDouglas
at October 24, 2006 04:29 AM
Hated Borat EDouglas? How come I'm not surprised, seeing as how I agree with comingsoon.net's reviews about 1% of the time and trust no one's criticism less.
Posted by: Stella's Boy
at October 24, 2006 05:54 AM
crazycris, if you think that's exciting, how bout the rest of the world getting Children of Men 2 months before America. I was very in love with that.
Plus, the movie was god damn good, so that helps.
On Borat... hmm. Couldn't this backfire. Majorly.
Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0
at October 24, 2006 06:01 AM
No, I haven't seen Borat yet. I've only seen trailers, clips and the like. Seeing it tomorrow, I guess. 1% huh? So what's your favorite movie this year, Stella? See No Evil?
Posted by: EDouglas
at October 24, 2006 06:16 AM
KCamel... not just CoM (which along with Prada made a weekend trip to London more than worthwhile for me!) but also Marie Antoinette... I saw that in June!!! :o)
I can understand our getting Volver early since it's a European film, but some of these others... Am enjoying this!!!, since I usually have to wait months for anything other than the big budget or big name films that have (almost) simultaneous international release dates...
Posted by: crazycris
at October 24, 2006 06:19 AM
It's funny how Europe gets all of the GOOD movies before the U.S. and all the bad movies six to seven months after the U.S. Maybe I need to move there. :)
Is there any chance for a movie like Grudge 2 to do any business in Europe after so much negative buzz from its U.S. opening?
Posted by: EDouglas
at October 24, 2006 06:21 AM
you're right there ED!
if a movie is particularly bad... it usually doesn't even make it across the Atlantic! So we don't have a tidal flood of films among which we have to pic and choose a decent flic! In Belgium (my current example) there are usually no more than 2-3 movies out each week and are often so different one from the other there's no overlap among the public.
I don't think the Grudge2's negative buzz will have much of an impact here... none of the target audience (high-school and college students from what I can tell) will hear about said buzz! And in Belgium it will be out for xmas holidays... so plenty of free time for students to go see it then!
Posted by: crazycris
at October 24, 2006 06:31 AM
David, I've seen Borat last friday at The Rome Film Festival. Often, it's very funny, but I have the impression that it works better as a 5-minutes tv report (maybe on YouTube), less in a movie. Anyway, if a comedy has to be subversive, sometimes I didn't get the joke. I mean, it's great to have fun of a racist rodeo attendant, but I don't know what's so funny to mock a very kind family at dinner.
As an european, I have the feeling that many american critics (not you, of course) are raving for the movie just to not be considered as stupid as the characters involved in it.
Anyway, even if the major newspapers in Italy have long articles about Borat, I noticed that the stuff published about this movie in my website has very few readers and probably, at least here, it will be a flop...
Posted by: Colinmckenzie75
at October 24, 2006 06:57 AM
waterbucket + his friends = college students = wanted to see Borat a long time ago = not that interested anymore = thanking the studio for dragging the release out far too long = using the collective money saved to get beer = good time all around
Posted by: waterbucket
at October 24, 2006 09:54 AM
waterbucket - Borat movie = not seeing the funniest movie of the year = waterbucket's loss.
Posted by: Stella's Boy
at October 24, 2006 10:00 AM
I can't remember hearing an audience laugh so hard and so loud and that's all I need to know. It can easily make 100 million based on word of mouth alone.
Posted by: InnerGeek
at October 24, 2006 12:15 PM
Thanks, ED. For a while there I thought I was the only one thinking that this thing has been hyped all out of proportion to its eventual gross, which I still believe won't be much past 40 mill.
And yes, I'm fully prepared to eat any sort of avian should I be proven wrong. I'm still sweeping up feathers from saying THE PRODUCERS would do 50.
Posted by: Cadavra
at October 24, 2006 12:30 PM
Is this the real Edouglas? He doesn't usually write so...passionately.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at October 24, 2006 12:44 PM
Well, this is the first time we're discussing Borat. Oh, wait, I mean the 500th time we're discussing Borat. My bad.
Posted by: TMJ
at October 24, 2006 01:39 PM
The only film BORAT should be compared to is JACKASS uno.
It's funny tv on the big screen. Its not the second coming. MARY was a better film on every conceivable level. The hype is getting sickening. EW cover was the nail in the coffin. BORAT is funny as hell in parts but the targets are soft and those who found it profound are perhaps a tad desperate. There is nothing original about this schtick. It used to be called Candid Camera.
Posted by: Jeffrey Boam's Doctor
at October 24, 2006 01:56 PM
I was just thinking yesterday that Jackass was the best comparison, and that Borat was likely to gross somewhere around Jackass 2's $70 million.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at October 24, 2006 01:58 PM
And so Fox stretches it out even more. The only thing I can think that they're trying to do here is build word-of-mouth with people who don't pay attention to the Internet buzz. However, 800 theaters isn't going to REACH most of those people, such as the people around here who heard NOTHING about Snakes on a Plane from the Internet and thought the movie sounded like the most retarded thing in the world. I literally went to a Saturday night screening of SoaP being one of two people in the theater.
Granted, I don't think they'd much care if they skipped Nebraska entirely, but it's people like these that they need to grab if they want it to be more than just a $35 million total gross blip, which is what it's going to be realistically if they don't start getting traction on more than the "in-the-know" people. It'll play well on DVD if it's as great a movie as most are saying (Haven't seen it. Hell, last weekend, with the Clint Eastwood war movie and the Batman Begins director's next film out, we got fucking FLICKA!), so you'll have a decent endgame there, but no SBC nomination or other such things. Screenings help, but how much I have no idea. The only thing I know about booking is that Mondays are EXCEPTIONALLY stressful for them, so I don't know if they could've closed the cap between Toronto and its release date, but I would've at least put the 800 screens THIS week and then gone a little wider the week after. I mean, is Saw III really going to eat up the audience for Borat?
I'm babbling at this point, but what I'm saying is they didn't strike when the fire was hot, and now they need to hit with something else. Maybe it's the power of the movie, but the only movie I've seen lately do that is The Deaprted and that's because it's a MOTHA'FUCKIN' MOVIE amongst a gaggle of puny genre crapfests.
Posted by: Joe Straat
at October 24, 2006 10:30 PM
You can take this for whatever it's worth, but on The Hollywood Stock Exchange, which is a disturbingly accurate predictor of grosses, BORAT has fallen almost in half in the past month, from a high of $71 a share to its current level of about $39; in other words, it's only expected to make 39 mill through its fourth weekend. Granted, some of that has to be a by-product of the cut in screen count, but still, it seems to reinforce those of us who believe it'll wind up closer to SNAKES than 4YOV.
Posted by: Cadavra
at October 27, 2006 01:54 PM
Cadavra, as a former HSX player (and a pretty good one at that), the $39 million four week thing is a bit deceptive. That's based on an opening weekend of 800 theatres, which is then multiplied by a set multiplier. Since the movie is reportedly expanding into more than twice as many theatres in Week 2, it's likely to make more than that amount by the end of Week 4. I expect this to behave like Bridget Jones' Diary.... which is a much better comparison than Steel Magnolias :)
Posted by: EDouglas
at October 27, 2006 09:13 PM
Well, I assume they're taking that expansion into consideration. But even if they don't, let's go whole hog and stipulate that twice 39 is $78 million--a very solid number, but still well short of the $100 million-plus so many are predicting...
Posted by: Cadavra
at October 29, 2006 11:06 AM
Everyone's favorite ranting contrarian is at it again. Armond hates Borat:
Posted by: jeffmcm
at November 1, 2006 12:39 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)