« Ebert Speaks! | Main | White Hot Horror »

May 01, 2007

In Tribeca, But Not At Tribeca

I've landed in rainy Manhattan, just around the corner from Tribeca FF headquarters, but I don't intend to spend my time here on this festival. There is a sense that I hear increasingly from New Yorkers that this is the year this festival has jumped the shark.

As it turns out, I got an anonymous note tonight from someone who clearly has issues with the festival. I will offer the full content of the e-mail after the jump, but in essence, it wonders aloud whether Tribeca was really a response to 9/11 in any way, as it turns out that Rosenthal, DeNiro, et al, bought the TribecaFilmFestival.com URL in April 2000.

As tough as I am on this festival and its intent, this is actually the kind of argument I have a hard time getting angry about. The fact that they came up with the idea before 9/11 but didn't move forward until after 9/11 allows, in my mind, some room to spin. They shouldn't have to prove that they never had the idea of a festival before doing it. Of course, spinning with the memory of 9/11 is not a good choice.

More significantly, Tribeca is still using the .org website as their primary site. If you go to tribecafilmfestival.com, it will send you to tribecafilmfestival.org. But dot-org is only meant to be used for not-for-profits, which TFF has not been for years.

Anyway... there will be a couple of Tribeca actvities sneaking in over the next week... but mostly... not.

"A response to the attacks on the World Trade Center"?
Documents reveal pre-9/11 plans for Tribeca Film Festival

"The Tribeca Film Festival was founded in 2002 by Robert De Niro, Jane
Rosenthal and Craig Hatkoff as a response to the attacks on the World
Trade Center." So claims the "About Us" page of the Tribeca Film
Festival's website, tribecafilmfestival.org.

De Niro, Rosenthal and Hatkoff, and scores of publicists and
journalists, have repeated this claim endlessly over the last five
years. That claim, however, is demonstrably false. Easily accessible
records reveal that The Tribeca Film Festival was being developed long
before September 11, 2001.

As mentioned, the Tribeca Film Festival website is
tribecafilmfestival.org. If the festival was founded as a response to
September 11, De Niro, Rosenthal, Hatkoff, and company, would have
purchased the domain name after that horrible day.

However, internet domain registration records, easily accessible
through domaintools.com, reveal that Tribeca Film Center, Inc., had
purchased the tribecafilmfestival.org domain on January 10, 2001 -
eight months and one day before September 11, 2001. Related records
reveal that Tribeca Film Center, Inc., had purchased
tribecafilmfestival.com on April 13, 2000 - nearly one year and five
months before September 11, 2001.

(See http://whois.domaintools.com/tribecafilmfestival.org and
http://whois.domaintools.com/tribecafilmfestival.com)

Many of the same people are behind the Tribeca Film Festival and the
Tribeca Film Center. According to TribecaFilmCenter.com, the Tribeca
Film Center was "co-founded in 1989 by Robert De Niro and Jane
Rosenthal," and there is no reason to dispute that.

But if the Tribeca Film Festival was founded "as a response to the
attacks on the World Trade Center," why would Tribeca Film Center,
Inc., have purchased tribecafilmfestival.org more than eight months
before September 11, 2001, and tribecafilmfestival.com nearly one year
and five months before the towers came down?(1) Certainly the
responsibles of Tribeca Film Center, Inc., could not have known what
would happen on September 11, 2001. They must have had other reasons
for developing their festival - reasons developed long before
September 11, 2001.

For De Niro, Rosenthal, Hatkoff, and company, to claim, endlessly,
that the festival was founded specifically "as a response to the
attacks on the World Trade Center" willfully misrepresents the history
of their institution. They have wrapped themselves in the flag of
9/11, to shield them from criticism as they have created a chaotic,
arrogant institution that annually turns Lower Manhattan into a zoo
for movie stars and "destination" tourists, an "event" whose
gentrifying presence contributes to endlessly spiraling cost of living
increases. These cost of living increases are now forcing many Lower
Manhattan residents out of the neighborhood that they had lived in and
rebuilt after the most horrific day in modern American history. In
part because of the Tribeca Film Festival, these true 9/11 heroes have
been displaced by trendy restaurants, expensive hotels, and caravans
of wealthy movie stars, club goers, and other wealthy tourists.

It is time for Robert De Niro, Jane Rosenthal, Craig Hatkoff, and
company, to stop talking about their festival as a service to the
community, and "as a response to the attacks on the World Trade
Center." It is time for them to talk about their other reasons for
establishing the festival, specifically the reasons they were
cultivating before September 11. Then, they should stop this,
offensive, crass exploitation altogether.

Notes:
1: It also is confusing why De Niro, Rosenthal, Hatkoff, and company,
use "tribecafilmfestival.org" as their main domain, rather "than
tribecafilmfestival.com." They own both domains, but .com redirects to
.org. Even though the festival is a for-profit entity, perhaps they
use .org as their main domain as a way to masquerade as a
not-for-profit, so they can rake in more money from the LMDC and
others.

Posted by poland at May 1, 2007 11:49 PM

Comments

.org domains are unrestricted and open for any entity's use...

Some may *think* .org domains are reserved or only meant for nonprofit organizations, but there are sites in all categories that use .org domains. Consider one of the largest, craigslist.org, which is a for-profit corporation...

Posted by: richardstrauss [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 2, 2007 12:31 AM

Thank you for that clarification... I tried to find a rule on .org, since I know that URL sellers don't stop anyone from buying them, but couldn't come up with one.

Posted by: David Poland [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 2, 2007 12:42 AM

so much for conspiracy theory-- the founders have frequently stated in public that they had thought for a long time about doing a film festival and had in fact analysyzed the numbers but there was no compelling reason to start what would seem like a superfluous festival- in the evaluation process the domain name was register for less than $10 as a place holder in case they ever decised to go forward

after 9-11 there was a compelling reason and a decision was made to go forward

sorry to debunk the conspiracy theory-- but keep on trying

Posted by: chatkoff [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 2, 2007 02:09 AM

I'm not sure that I agree that it's fair to ascribe this all to "a conspiracy theory."

I certainly don't think there is a conspiracy... just some intentional disinformation being used to spin the press for the fest.

The illusion - and the maintenance of the illusion - that Tribeca is, like every other highly funded festival in the world, a not-for-profit is problematic. The constant screed that this is all somehow meant to be supportive of the community as a primary goal is problematic. The choice to raise ticket prices to $18, which can't add more than about $500,000 to the coffers of the fest, from an acknowledged budget of $13 million, effectively disconnecting from a lot of the public, is more than problematic for me.

I assume you are pro-Tribeca, Chatkoff. I hope you will make your affirmative arguments on these issues or overall. Because I'm not feeling it. And I am not a conspiracy guy.

Posted by: David Poland [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 2, 2007 10:21 AM

Gasp! Does this mean DeNiro knew beforehand about the 9/11 attacks?? That sneaky liberal bastard!

Posted by: Cadavra [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 2, 2007 11:04 AM

Do we think that DeNiro is a liberal, Cad?

Posted by: David Poland [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 2, 2007 01:04 PM

Nope, just going for the joke.

Posted by: Cadavra [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 2, 2007 11:40 PM

of course the real issues with Tribeca this year were that little of it happened below Canal street, bad scheduling, particularly too few movies playing simultaneously at the same venue, very little buzz between filmgoers, too many commercial films. bad enough that individual films were $18 but, as a passholder (for the third year in a row), it was impossible to get any value. next year i'm not going to bother.

Posted by: lisa [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 7, 2007 05:59 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?