« Rader Does Vanity Fair | Main | The Comedy Of Commenting »

October 16, 2007

I Am Shiva, The God Of Death

Another trip to see Michael Clayton reminded me, vividly, of what I love about the movie. Multiple viewings not only let you see small things you didn’t see before, but they allow some things that you might have been paying too much attention to before blend a bit into the smooth caramel of the film.

“I’m not a miracle worker… I’m a garbage man.”

Michael Clayton’s journey to self-awareness is one that starts with, amazingly enough, self-awareness. And in that, I think Tony Gilroy has found the central thesis of this moment in our social history. We are all so conscious… we are all so loaded up with information at speeds beyond any in history… we are all so thoughtful, picking apart the psychology of our lives and others in life and with a swift kick by the OprahMedia… and still, we are all so full of shit. And we know it.

This is a theme in many of the films we are looking at this awards season. But so far, Michael Clayton is the only one to mix Hollywood accessibility with a hard, demanding look at the lies we tell ourselves and those we love just to survive… or so we think.

The script is already a prohibitive favorite to win Best Original Screenplay (there are very few such scripts even up for competition this year… and none of those that are have the combination of pedigree, accessibility, and quotability) and the battle for Best Supporting Actor is already shaking down to Bardem vs Wilkinson. Ironically, Bardem’s magic trick is a nearly silent performance while Wilkinson makes Gilroy’s words fly mighty close to the sun.

Some movies grow and grow and grow on you. Others fade quickly. Gilroy isn’t quite Chayefsky, in no small part because Gilroy isn’t trying to tell the future. Chayefsky knew where we were and where we were going. Gilroy is interested in now. But the now we are in is one of the most challenging ones in a long time… perhaps since Chayefsky’s time. And yet, it is also a just plain good movie. And that does my heart good.

Posted by poland at October 16, 2007 05:41 PM

Comments

Great stuff, DP. Couldn't agree more.

Posted by: MASON [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 06:06 PM

awesome flick.

i want to see it again.

Posted by: anghus [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 06:53 PM

To steal from a previous entry by David:

"Every once in a while, I feel like Armond White is speaking for me in ways that I don't speak."


ARMOND DOES CLAYTON (http://www.nypress.com/20/40/film/ArmondWhite.cfm?CFID=5979458&CFTOKEN=44416347)

I actually am not in 100% step in step with Armond on this one. If you were to pin me down to which review most closely reflects my opinion on the films, it would be Manhola Dargis, where she states it is a more finely tuned legal thriller-classier than "The Firm" or "The Devil's Advocate." But, Armond make some really correct points on this picture. It is really funny to me that Dave is jumping up and down over this picture and yet was so down on "Syriana" and "Jesse James" because they are faded copies of Malick, Pollack, and Pakula (my paraphrasing of your original arguments). What is this film if not a copy/readjustment of all 70's conspiracy films (though a very good readjustment)? Also, can we stop with the Paddy Chayefesky was this Biblical prophet who saw this our present "last days" of a rotting future? Our past was never naive/innocent as we look back from the present. The most brilliant argument for this is the current, brilliant first season of "Mad Men".

Posted by: djiggs [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 07:21 PM

One thing that's slightly misleading about your musings Dave, is that the line you quoted from Clayton may come at the beginning of the film, but it's in flashforward and chronologically doesn't come until after most of the action of the film.

Does he have a fairly cyncial attitude about what he does a few days earlier? Perhaps.

SPOILER WARNING (added by editor)

But it seems to me that it's the way he's treated by Pollack and Company, the death of his friend and the deaths his law firm is helping to cover-up (or avoid responsibility for) that bring him to the state of disillusionment we see him in, and hear him acknowledge so bluntly when he gets to that hit & run guy's house.

Still, I agree that it's a great screenplay, though Original Screenplay is the category of indie quirk recognition and I'm not so sure it's the likely winner over Juno, or maybe even Ratatouille.

Posted by: lazarus [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 07:31 PM

I finally saw it today. Very entertaining. And yes, the theme of smarts vs wisdom is certainly relevant. Watching it I couldn't help but think, "How fucked up is the someone who wants to be a lawyer these days?" An idea which funny enough haunts the entire film.

It's one of the few recent Hollywood films that shows a value system and seems to mean it. Everyone associated should be proud. I hope it finds an audience.

Posted by: Crow T Robot [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 07:40 PM

It's a great movie. I think it could go all the way with the major noms. It is far and away one of the best of the year and with Sydney Pollack, steven Soderbergh and Anthony Minghella producing well...that's a lot of friends in town. Clooney is amazing. The writing is brilliant.

Posted by: bipedalist [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 07:45 PM

Damn it... SPOILER warnings!!!

Posted by: David Poland [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 07:49 PM

SPOILER

One of the things that is so brilliant about it, Laz, is that we don't know the context at the start and see how much it is progress at the end.

But on both timelines, his role is discussed early and often. He is not unaware... but by the end, he is AWARE.

Posted by: David Poland [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 07:52 PM

I'm just amazed at how much more I like the movie with each passing day. It's like a polaroid picture slowly developing in front of you until you can finally see everything so clearly. It's an amazing picture and I recently wrote a piece on it and I could have easily written two thousand or three thousand more words on it. It's just such a rich, dense picture with real characters that are flawed and human.

Posted by: Noah [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 08:03 PM

Funny, your spoiler warning draws more attention to that comment than it otherwise would have, :-)

Posted by: bipedalist [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 08:52 PM

Sorry, I was trying to be vague, but I guess not enough.

On your last point Dave, agreed. At times I wonder if Gilroy's use of time frame was too gimmicky, but it does seem to work, esp from the character standpoint. And without venturing into spoiler territory again, do you think that first scene should end earlier with him just looking at the horses, and saving the rest for the climax?

Posted by: lazarus [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 09:52 PM

Juno's going to be tough to beat for screenplay but if anyone can do it...all of the serious heat is in adapted screenplay, as usual.

Posted by: bipedalist [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2007 09:56 PM

I would like to see Ratatouille be labelled the favourite, but of course it's not. :(

Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0 [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2007 03:59 AM

I liked Juno, but let's be honest - its going to be completely and utterly overlooked come Oscar time.

People who think the way people talk in Juno are the way "kids" talk in real life are the same people who have been watching too much Gilmore Girls....

Posted by: bobbob911 [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2007 08:08 AM

"People who think the way people talk in Juno are the way "kids" talk in real life are the same people who have been watching too much Gilmore Girls...."

Do hitmen really talk the way they do in Pulp Fiction?

Do businessmen really talk the way they do in Glengarry Glenn Ross?

Do TV newsmen talk the way they do in Network?

Let's not start penalizing a film for an original voice because it doesn't adhere to the verisimilitudes standards of what you think 16 year olds sound like (especially one that's clearly meant to embody the spirit of Diablo Cody).

If something as craptastic and glib as Little Miss Sunshine can win this category this past year than I think Ms. Cody is certainly in the running.

Posted by: ASD [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2007 03:08 PM

Terrific movie, but the main thing I took away from Michael Clayton:

27 years have turned "Caddyshack's" Danny Noonan into "24's" Gregory Itzin.

Posted by: LexG [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2007 03:17 PM

Thanks for pointing that out and evaporating part of my childhood, Lex.

I guess the snobs beat the slobs after all.

"You take drugs, Danny?

"Every day."

"Good. Then what's your problem?"

Now THAT was a screenplay.

Posted by: lazarus [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2007 03:26 PM

Who stepped on a duck?

Posted by: bipedalist [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2007 04:54 PM

I totally agree I really loved this movie. But for a screen play that is so quotable isn't the actual quote: "I'm not a miracle worker, I'm a janitor."

Posted by: Monco [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2007 05:36 PM

I think someone else called him a janitor, Monco... but I could be wrong.

As per Danny Noonan's advancing years - "He's an asshole... and he knows it!"

Posted by: David Poland [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2007 06:38 PM

Check back in five years when everybody realizes this film is an empty suit.

Posted by: Devin Faraci [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 18, 2007 11:37 AM

This just in: five years from now Devin Feraci watches Michael Clayton and finally understands what all the fuss is about. He then remembers what he once stupidly wrote on The Hot Blog, and sadly it makes him think of a decidedly intellectual but aptly fitting quote, "there is nothing more loathsome than the self one has outgrown."

Posted by: bipedalist [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 18, 2007 11:45 AM

Well written post and an incredible movie. I'm going to resist the urge to be snarky because I've made this type of mistake more times than I wish to remember; the quote is: " I'm not a miracle worker, I'm a janitor."

Posted by: Charley Nobel [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 27, 2008 11:28 AM

Definition of a great screenplay: googling my favorite quote from the movie, finding this blog, and being in 100% agreement with the author.

I'm just pissed that it took me this long to see this amazing movie.

Posted by: RyanO [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 7, 2008 12:37 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?