« Why We Strike | Main | BYOB - November 5 »
November 05, 2007
$.003 Held Hostage - Day One
Perhaps the most dangerous place to be picketing seem to be Sunset-Gower Studios. After TV reports of a writer being run down - with no indication of why it happened or what injury, other than to footwear, was sustained - this afternoon saw a 7-car pile up in almost the exact same spot at about 3:45. No information about how that happened. But if you see a car coming towards you, through down the Starbucks and run, picketers!
Paramount set up a “neutral gate” on Gower, specifying in detail who could come through the gate, and thus avoiding pickets at that gate. It would not be used as an opportunity to avoid pickets for most people on the lot. There were pickets at the Gower foot entrance to the studio.
Reports of about 100 picketers this morning in front Fox.
Word is that tomorrow morning, picketing will start in the early a.m. hours in order to set up some more pronounced confrontations with Teamster and other deliveries.
As suggested here last week, there is no history of the Teamsters actually refusing to cross lines in any showbiz union strike (in ’88, they were out at the same time as WGA, in part), in spite of the suggestion of support last week. The story of that support was grossly exaggerated in almost every quarter. Journalism must be careful about fair weather friends and loudmouthed anonymous sources who can not be held accountable.
That said, it struck me as I passed a few different patches of picketing writers how utterly old fashioned the idea of picketing is. Whose attention are picketers trying to get? More significantly, wasn’t the power of the picket line to shame and physically intimidate anyone who might cross the line? How much more ironic can a strike being held centered on 2.0 ideas of delivery while the method of registering trouble is so antiquated… at least until a writer is going to pick up a pen and shove it in a picket line crosser’s ear.
Posted by poland at November 5, 2007 04:07 PM
Comments
"...how utterly old fashioned the idea of picketing is..."
well not really--it's the best way for passersby to notice/draw attention to industrial action..it really isn't used to deter scabs anymore (unlike the old days) as much anyway.
Posted by: Lota
at November 5, 2007 07:39 PM
While this goes on, BEOWULF is getting Best Picture ink:
Stephen Schaefer of the BOSTON HERALD:
[I]Seeing is believing with Robert Zemeckis’ mighty, monumental “Beowulf,” which opens Nov. 16. This extravagant adaptation of the epic poem about a cursed kingdom invents a 6th century A.D. Denmark that is so richly detailed, romantic and engrossing it’s like seeing the Prince Valiant comic strip brought to blazing, 3-D life, a childhood fantasy realized in such a complete way you’re stupefied with delight. Using the motion capture technique that “Lord of the Flies” managed to create the lisping monster Gollum and that Zemeckis employed on the saccharine “Polar Express,” “Beowulf” is nothing less than an immersion into a world that is somehow familiar – they live in a harsh climate like Boston, they drink mead, get drunk and pass out, they have a wife and a mistress – and totally strange with its demons that morph into flying dragons, sea monsters that can be slain by blond Beowulf, a hero for all times. The fight scenes are startling, not the least because like “Eastern Empires” Beowulf is nude as he takes on Grendel in mano a mano to-the-death combat. The homoeroticism, a friend said, outdoes Gerald Butler’s “300” by “500.” Ray Winstone may look nothing like this sleek god-like warrior but he sounds perfect. The cast includes a brilliantly underplayed aging king by Anthony Hopkins, a Bette Davis-style villain in John Malkovich and Angelina Jolie’s siren, a shape-changing seriously seductive sylph who gets a laugh in her six-inch heels. Big Oscar Question: Is this in the running for Best Picture or Best Animated Feature? [/I]
Posted by: Ian Sinclair
at November 5, 2007 07:57 PM
We all can't wait until you finally see it.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at November 5, 2007 08:18 PM
Ian Spamclair needs a hobby.
Posted by: Wrecktum
at November 5, 2007 09:39 PM
I imagine people seeing Beowulf in regular cinemas will not be as keen as those who see it in Imax. The animation (if you call it that) looks quite crude in the trailers when seen on a big screen.
Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0
at November 5, 2007 11:29 PM
A more general comment on the strike. First, I'm one of those crazy people who thinks the whole idea of intellectual property is absurd. The strongest argument for IP is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, where we see the utilitarian argument. Intellectual property is basically created in order to give people an incentive to produce and create.
The problem I have with the corporations is that they have always belittled the writers, the people who are the true content creators. Directors and actors interpret a writer's creative vision, but they get more prestige and power by virtue of the fact that ANYONE thinks they can write. It's just a matter of putting words down on a page, right? Everyone does it; I'm doing it now. Not everyone has a strong jaw-line, a smoking-hot figure, or goes to film school to learn about lenses and lighting. Naturally we have to reward the beautiful people (George Clooney gained weight, Nicole Kidman put on a prosthetic nose!), and we have to cower in fear at the technical expertise of those directors. But we'll find any possible way to give writers the shaft.
The studios are up in arms over Internet piracy, losing a chunk of profits on the highly lucrative, low marginal cost production of DVDs. Yet, at the same time they want to block out the people responsible for creating that product in the first place.
Posted by: Cain
at November 6, 2007 12:34 AM
I don't think it's because we're writers that the AMPTP is not caving to our demands. They know all the Guilds are going to get the same rate, so no matter who went first, the AMPTP is going to try to get the rate as low as possible.
When the AMPTP ends up making a deal on Internet residuals with the DGA, it won't be because they respect what directors do more. It'll be because they can get the DGA negotiators to the number they want.
Had we reopened the 2004 Sideletter back in January or so, we probably could've gotten to that number ourselves and not gone on strike over Internet residuals.
Posted by: RDP
at November 6, 2007 06:12 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)