« Home Again... Naturally. | Main | Box Office Hell - 4/11 »
April 10, 2008
A Must See
Tarsem's The Fall is a deeply flawed piece of storytelling... but if you are at all serious about cinema, you MUST see the film on a big screen during its upcoming run via Roadside Attractions, supported by "Presented by" credits from Fincher and Jonze.
Tarsem made this movie on his own dime, shooting for years around his schedule of commerical shoots in the world's most exotic locations. And piece by piece, it is frickin' breathtaking. The story device - a sick soldier telling the story to a little girl in order to trick her into getting him drugs that he wants to use to commit suicide - is iffy, though in the end, the emotion works. But the tale, which mixes The Wizard of Oz, Baron Munchausen, and other admitted tall tales leads to exception bouts of visual imagination unlike you will see in all but a small handful of films.
So... see it.
Unless your date is studying film at Columbia, you may not get laid until you wake him/her up and get her to another movie. But if you love the visual, you owe it to yourself to suck this one back.

The trailer... and my review from Toronto '06
Posted by poland at April 10, 2008 06:25 PM
Comments
I've been waiting for this movie since I first heard about it. I don't care how much flack The Cell gets, that movie is astounding. I just hope they release here within a year. We're finally getting The Painted Veil released in cinemas next week! :/
Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0
at April 10, 2008 09:01 PM
The story device - a sick soldier telling the story to a little girl in order to trick her into getting him drugs that he wants to use to commit suicide
Is this a spoiler?
Posted by: eugenen
at April 10, 2008 10:10 PM
"Unless your date is studying film at Columbia, you may not get laid until you wake him/her up and get her to another movie. But if you love the visual, you owe it to yourself to suck this one back."
And if you do get laid, you owe it to your date to suck them back too.
Posted by: Hallick
at April 10, 2008 11:34 PM
Okay, I didn't think The Cell was horrible like a lot of people do, but Singh (I'm not going to indulge the pretension and call him 'Tarsem', screw that) needs to prove that he can transcend the music-video director ghetto and actually show command of character and narrative and then we'll take it from there.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at April 10, 2008 11:49 PM
No, Eugenen... pretty much laid out from the start. The story is not terribly sophisticated in that way.
Posted by: David Poland
at April 11, 2008 01:30 AM
I would never go out with a film student from Columbia? Have you seen their tuition?! I like to go Dutch.
Posted by: repeatfather
at April 11, 2008 09:30 AM
"The story device - a sick soldier telling the story to a little girl in order to trick her into getting him drugs that he wants to use to commit suicide
Is this a spoiler?"
I gleaned as much from the trailer, so I doubt its a spoiler.
Posted by: mysteryperfecta
at April 11, 2008 11:24 AM
When does this come out, or screen, in LA?
Posted by: Aris P
at April 11, 2008 11:36 AM
The hosting site (apple.com) shows a release date of May 9th. The trailer looks amazingly beautiful, so here's hoping.
Posted by: bmcintire
at April 11, 2008 11:46 AM
I don't think every director needs to show command of character and narrative...that's just a limiting view of what a film can be. I wouldn't ask Jodorowsky to make a film like that, although it could be argued that he has. But it's not what seems to interest him.
Posted by: The Big Perm
at April 11, 2008 12:14 PM
Sure, but I think it's an undervalued trait today. And I don't think Jodorowsky is a good comparison because his movies were never pretty for pretty's sake like so many music video directors seem to think equals art.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at April 11, 2008 12:26 PM
The poor man's Gilliam.
I'm often surprised that the people who argue that Tarsem's visuals make the Cell worth watching alone, so it doesn't matter how bad the story is, often don't extend the same latitude to Michael Bay. Likely it's because Bay is not an Artiste!
Posted by: westpilton
at April 11, 2008 12:46 PM
There's a big difference between Singh's visuals and Bay's visuals. Bay hires good cinematographers and points the camera at pretty things, and that's all. Singh at least shows some signs of having had an art history education.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at April 11, 2008 01:17 PM
Not every director needs to show command of character and narrative... but if the director chooses to tell a narrative, with characters in it-- as Tarsem has!-- it would certainly help.
Posted by: Eric
at April 11, 2008 01:59 PM
As Harry Cohn memorably said to an art director requesting more money to make a set look less chintzy: "If they're watching the sets instead of the actors, we're fucked."
Posted by: Cadavra
at April 11, 2008 04:35 PM
Damn straight.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at April 12, 2008 02:42 AM
The final 30 minutes or so (it's been a while) of The Cell has some of the most fascinating character work of that year.
My very favourite review of that film is the one below. It's a great read whether you like the film or not.
Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0
at April 12, 2008 08:22 AM
The Fall is opening in New York and LA on May 9th and then rolling out from there.
Posted by: errolmorrisfan
at April 12, 2008 09:57 AM
Anyone up for discussing this again now that it's been out a bit?
While I admired so many of the visuals, it felt like I'd seen this story at least twice in recent years, those it occupies a curiously indifferent middle ground between the atrocious "Tideland" and the fine "Pan's Labyrinth."
Tarsem certainly has a way with a striking, usually sinister image, but the characters in the real-life story were pretty underdeveloped and not particularly sympathetic. Odd that in its day "Blade Runner" was considered cold and "style over substance"; That film looks warm and fuzzy compared to the ciphers on hand here. No one ever likes to pick on a kid, but the lead girl is pretty cloying in spots, and even much of the fantastical "epic" story is kind of dorky and embarrassing (I'm thinking of the GOOGLY bits and that part where the soundtrack song sings the dialogue a beat after it's spoken.)
I was fairly bored through long stretches, though THE BLUE CITY fucking RULED, and things pick up nicely at the end when every starts getting THEIR ASSES OWNED.
Amusingly, the classical piece-- Beethoven's 7th, I believe-- that plays over the beginning and end credits and repeats throughout is the same piece used by Boorman in ZARDOZ and Gaspar Noe in IRREVERSIBLE.
I guess when you hear the 7th in a movie, you can now safely assume some maniac director is about to drop some seriously pretentious idiocy on you.
Posted by: LexG
at May 24, 2008 07:49 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)