« Watchmen Is Covered | Main | BYOB - Friday The Pre-Oscarteenth »
February 19, 2009
Miri & Zack... A Blu Movie
I have been persona non grata with Kevin Smith for a long while now. But I keep on hoping that he will become as good a filmmaker as he is a raconteur.
Someone sent me blu-ray of Zack & Miri Make A Porno, I had no idea what to expect. But in I jumped.
And you know what… it was a real movie.
It wasn’t just a bunch of jokes strung together with no style or skill in matching or good cinematography or editing. Somewhere between Clerks II and this, his DP, David Klein, learned how to deliver professional looking product. Same for Smith as his own editor. I have been very critical of his directorial skills in the past, but I have to say, with the exception of some of the cuts that I would have liked to have seen stay in, I didn’t have more than a tiny number of moments when I was distracted in any way by the production. This is a quality studio movie within the genre.
The material… imperfect. But I found it very entertaining. And I watched ALL of the outtakes offered in the extras package. Watching those, it became clear just how serious Smith was this time around with controlling his work and not just to have a party and invite his bffs to ride with him and his attitude posse.
Smith also got two very strong performances out of Seth Rogan and Elizabeth Banks… and another big one from Justin Long, whose 20 minute-plus outtake I watched, during which Superwhatsits tried his best to keep up, but was way overmatched.
Smith’s weakest moments as a director remain the sincere ones. At the inevitable moment in the film when Zack & Miri fall in lust and love, he just doesn’t quite know how to turn that trick. But to his credit, he stuck with it with a level of fearlessness that he hasn’t shown before when offering intimacy on film. It was like he didn’t feel comfortable enough to let the intimacy be and to build the comedy around it like he instinctually would… because the comedy has always eaten the intimacy alive. But he was really close to the answer.
I don’t want to be overly critical or overly generous to the film. I liked it. But more importantly, it strikes me as a film that is likely to launch the next act of Kevin Smith’s directorial career. He showed here, for the first time, that he is comfortable (finally!) with the idea of being both a provocateur and a traditional filmmaker.
If you want to color outside the lines, you either need to be a true outsider iconoclast – which Smith was when he made Clerks – or you need to have the skills to deliver the basic goods… and THEN take it to the next place. I think Kevin Smith is now ready to do that. And I am thrilled. For him. But more so, for us.
There are few people who seem so much to be the guys you would just love to hang out with and listen to for hours… who are loyal, the way he is…. and vulnerable, the way he is… and talented, the way he is. I don’t know that he will ever make a film that is not, in some serious way, about him. But the same is true of most of our greatest directors. There are those who are so skilled at craftsmen that they can really do anything. But the ones like that who ever reach higher are rare. The great ones are all in their work. And Smith can be one of those guys. We all wanted to believe it… but Zack & Miri is the proof that I have been waiting for.
Posted by dpoland at February 19, 2009 10:39 PM
Comments
The brother really does seem like he's ready to take it to another level. It's about time. He has the skillz, the talent, and Scott Mosier. The fucking guy can go places. He just has to be willing to put the extra key in the Bulgatti, and amp it up to 250. If you get what I am stating.
Posted by: IOIOIOI
at February 19, 2009 11:34 PM
[waits for Jeff to ask for an explanation]
Posted by: IOIOIOI
at February 19, 2009 11:35 PM
I dunno, I normally enjoy Smith's films, and I thought this one was pretty dull.
Posted by: Nordling
at February 20, 2009 03:37 AM
The final act was very atrocious and went a long way to making it completely undesireable as a rewatch prospect.
Plus, I know the whole point was that their movie wasn't good and that only their high school "friends" would watch it, but... god damn that was a terrible porn movie they were making. Even by porn standards I bet.
Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0
at February 20, 2009 03:46 AM
He's been making the same movie for awhile. There's more polish now, but it's essentially the same movie he's been making for 15 years.
Loveable losers.
Sex.
Star Wars References.
Shuffle.
Repeat.
There's no growth, at least from my perspective, in his work. I think at certain points, everyone finds his work entertaining, but you gain nothing by watching all of his films. If you've seen Clerks and Dogma, you've seen the entire creative spectrum of his output.
And i'm not even bashing the guy. I think he makes an entertaining movie, he just keeps making it over and over and over and over again (Dogma being the exception).
Posted by: anghus
at February 20, 2009 05:27 AM
I don't think Zach and Miri is any better than Clerks/Chasing Amy/Dogma. In fact, I enjoy all Kevin Smith's films at about the same level. He is pretty predictable that way.
I am curious if he can work in a different genre.
Posted by: pchu
at February 20, 2009 05:33 AM
I'm interested in this one because of Smith bringing in a lot of Apatow's people. I sort of like Smith, but his writing is so overly precious and then he casts actors who are decent but not excellent...and the movies come off like awkward high school plays. A lot of his younger actors seem done in by his dialogue, while someone like Alan Rickman can make anything work and he does okay.
Posted by: The Big Perm
at February 20, 2009 06:24 AM
Actually, I thought Zack and Miri was easily Smith's best film.
It was so much more polished than his previous efforts (all of which I at least liked), and I thought the serious moments were actually some of the better ones - his use of the Live song was the best music cue of the year.
Aside from the presence of a couple of his regulars, in fact, I would never have guessed Smith was responsible. Well, except for the stupid fecal gag, which should have been left on the cutting room floor.
Posted by: Josh Massey
at February 20, 2009 07:35 AM
That's funny Josh & DP that you say it's his best film in terms of looks and professionalism when I thought it seemed like a rush job. I LOVE the film but it's my least favorite Kevin Smith...even behind "Jersey Girl" which I feel is a way, way too harshly judged spin on the screwball romantic comedy.
I also agree that there's several GREAT performances here including Rogen, Banks (she's ALWAYS good) and Long. But Craig Robinson is also outstanding. His walking of the line between devoted hubby and get-me-the-fuck-out-of-this-marriage guy was inspired.
And angus-
I think you're thinking too much on the surface. Alot of great directors (especially writer/directors) work through the same issues the same ways over and over again. Just because Smith's overtly geek/fanboy influences register more at a face value (and lets admit it, seem childish), doesn't make them less important. Well, at least to Smith and those who relate to him like me.
He's supposedly doing a very hard "R" horror film next ("Red State") so we shall see. But I'm glad people are coming back to "Zack and Miri" on DVD because I think it's the funniest movie of 2008. Maybe even 2007 but I can't think that far back this early.
Posted by: don lewis (was PetalumaFilms)
at February 20, 2009 08:29 AM
Actually, he is not sure what he is doing next. I attended a Q&A session in Toronto a couple of weeks ago, and he said he isn't quite sure what's up with Red State, he probably needs financing for it since Harvey Weinstein isn't signing up for this one.
He did mention how disappointed he was with Zach and Miri in terms of how it did in the box office.
Posted by: pchu
at February 20, 2009 09:21 AM
Perhaps I'll check it out now.
After Clerks II and Jersey Girl, I was done. Particularly Clerks II, still might be one of the least enjoyable movie experiences of my life. I found Smith to be affable, but very smug and full of himself. Both times he was on Jon Favreau's "Dinner for Five" I was this close to chucking the TV set. But, I like DP's sentiment of talent finding it's groove. Always a good thing.
Posted by: Hopscotch
at February 20, 2009 09:36 AM
All that after one movie, Dave? Wow.
Posted by: a_loco
at February 20, 2009 09:36 AM
The gag Josh Massey mentioned was my favorite bit in the whole movie.
That said, it didn't really strike me as significantly different from Clerks II or anything else he's doing in the last 10 years.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at February 20, 2009 09:56 AM
That fecal gag makes me LOL every time. I'm easy to please in terms of fart/poop jokes and balls kicking.
"Red State" worries me simply because all Smith ever says is how hardcore and edgy it is. How nobody wants to finance it because it's just sooo out there. The ONE thing that drives me insane about Smith is how he believes his own hype way, way too much and just jumps right in line with whatever he hears about his projects and trumpets that word from on high.
Like how he parrots that the reason everyone hated "Jersey Girl" was because of Bennifer. Like how "Clerks 2" got a 10 minute standing O at Cannes and that meant big things. Now, how "Red State" is just not going to get funded because it's just soooooo freaky and out there. I mean, come on.
As much as I love the guy, I simply cannot fathom the "twisted" mind of Kevin Smith is more twisted than Eli Roth or Gaspar Noe.
Posted by: don lewis (was PetalumaFilms)
at February 20, 2009 03:28 PM
I'm with anghus ... I walked out of "Zack and Miri" because I paid for something rated R and got NC-17 instead.
Posted by: Chucky in Jersey
at February 20, 2009 04:09 PM
ELIZABETH BANKS IS CHARMING.
Posted by: LexG
at February 20, 2009 04:12 PM
Chucky went into a movie with "prono" on the title and got offended by the content? Funny!
I'd agree with Don about Red State. I don't think Kevin has the chops to make a truly edgy horror movie. I'd imagine it's like Dogma, where it has controversial topics if you're predisposed to be affected by them...but to the average viewer, was Dogma shocking at all? It was like a tv movie and was horribly shot.
Posted by: The Big Perm
at February 20, 2009 05:17 PM
I can't get over how odd it looks to have someone scream 'CHARMING' at us all. Like a dowager yelling "WOULD YOU CARE FOR A CUP OF TEA" at the top of her withered lungs.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at February 20, 2009 07:14 PM
I find it far less stress on the eyeballs tho.
Posted by: christian
at February 20, 2009 07:38 PM
Jeffy Mac proves the POSSIMPBLE!
Posted by: IOIOIOI
at February 20, 2009 10:36 PM
"Zack and Miri" is the single worst film Smith ever wrote/directed.
He's become as redundant in the post-Apatow era as John Waters was after "There's Something About Mary" brought Waters' shock-at-all-costs schtick into the mainstream and found a larger audience than all of the Baltimore auteur's previous films combined.
Sad, but true.
Posted by: movieman
at February 21, 2009 03:46 PM
John Waters is funny. He has remained funny in a world, where the Farrelly's have become increasingly unfunny. SO I have to disagree with you on this point, and about Zach and Miri. Which is neither here nor there, but it's not horrible or horribly directed. Smith is competent. If he were not so hung up on directing his own work. He would go to TV, learn how to hussle and move on a TV set, and possibly learn as a director.
Until he gets over himself in a professional way. He will never ever get past this point in his career.
Posted by: IOIOIOI
at February 21, 2009 04:49 PM
No no, John Waters has always been about more than mere 'shock'. He deserves way more credit than that. And A Dirty Shame was as entertaining and as vital as just about any movie from the last several years.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at February 21, 2009 07:23 PM
On this we agree, jeff.
Posted by: IHeartThatCurtis!
at February 22, 2009 12:24 AM
I used to worship John Waters.
"Pink Flamingos," "Female Trouble," "Desperate Living," "Polyester," "Hairspray," even "Cry Baby."
They were outrageously funny, genuinely subversive-anarchic works that crawled out from the underground and took no prisoners. But Waters' recent work has felt rudderless, unfocused, artistically/socially irrelevant ("Serial Mom," "Cecil B. Demented," "Pecker," "A Dirty Shame," too--sorry Jeff). Once the "culture" as a whole began playing Waters' game, he seemed to run out of both gas and ideas.
With "Zack and Miri," Smith reached the same artistic/creative dead end. No one would deny that Judd Apatow has essentially mainstreamed the type of potty-mouthed, pop-culture-referencing schtick that's been Smith's bread-and-butter since "Clerks 1" and--in some ways (slicker production values; more polished acting)--actually done it "better." I say that with a tinge of sadness because I've championed my share of Smith movies over the years ("Chasing Amy" and "Dogma" still look like masterpieces to me, and I even love "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" as an auteurist goof). Instead of merely chasing Apatow's tail (good luck with that, Kev), I think Smith really needs to try something new--a genre piece might not be such a bad idea-- and see if it sticks. Except for the Pittsburgh Steelers joke and Craig Robinson's genuinely funny performance, "Zack and Miri"
felt as flat, stale/antiquated and genuinely, depressingly irrelevant as much of Waters' latter work.
Posted by: movieman
at February 22, 2009 05:48 AM
Movieman, I wouldn't disagree with you on Serial Mom, Cecil B. Demented, or Pecker. But I think the Bush years reinvigorated Waters to actually go for the gusto in ADS and it resulted in his most bracing, formally interesting, funny movie since at least Cry-Baby.
Posted by: jeffmcm
at February 22, 2009 11:57 AM
awesome, movieman
i must confess about kevin smith, i'm neither here nor there about most of his flicks with the exception of 'chasing amy', 'mallrats' and 'dogma', which i really like, but i have a thing for him as a actor, in 'catch and release' in particular - not a wild crush per se, i just want to hang out with sam, i want him to be my friend and do stuff with him, how weird and a little pathetic is that?
Posted by: leahnz
at February 22, 2009 12:48 PM
Not "weird" or "pathetic" at all, Leah. I've always enjoyed listening to Smith talk movies and a whole variety of other pop culture-ish things: he's a blast. And since we're in a confessional mode, I share your weakness for "Catch and Release" (and Smith's appealing performance).
I appreciate where you're coming from re: "Shame," Jeff: it's certainly Waters' most interesting, and probably enjoyable, film since "Cry Baby." But I can't really share your enthusiam.
In fact, I''ve sometimes wondered over the past decade and a half whether Waters' heart is even in it (i.e., making movies) anymore. Even the NC-17 "Shame" seemed mild, passe and denatured to me next to his balls-to-the-walls (sometimes literally) '70s masterpieces.
I sure hope that he's getting regular "Hairspray the Musical" residual checks.
Posted by: movieman
at February 22, 2009 02:58 PM
'I share your weakness for "Catch and Release" (and Smith's appealing performance).'
good lord, there's two of us!
Posted by: leahnz
at February 22, 2009 04:19 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)