« MGM Mktg Is Smart... And Has Too Much Time On Its Hands | Main | BYOB Tuesday Style »

July 14, 2009

Take a Rumor And Kill Me... Kill Me... BF'in Deal Me...

Ya gotta love it when anyone slams the web for being gossipy just before they throw out some more gossip.

Today it's Michael Fleming of The Big Fucking Deal Memo. He followed up on rumors - oddly, ones I haven't paid any attention to because they are so absurd... a good tool for living online, Mike - that there was a Guy Ritchie version of Guys & Dolls heading to feature production.

In the process, he repeated and got a soft-sold endorsement of a 3-year-old rumor that there would be a Hugh Jackman version of the the classic stage musical. The "endorsement" came from one of the lawyers for one of the rights holders of the show. (The lawyer also takes the chance to slam the recent Broadway revival... without acknowledging that his team had to endorse that show happening... making them as responsible as the poor casting for its troubles.)

I have two problems with Fleming on this piece. The first one is easy... he notes that Jackman is working with Fox towards a film version of Carousel... and there is no way that Jackman, who is career-concerned about becoming just a muscial guy, will be doing two musicals in the same 5 years. So unless Carousel goes away, he is not doing a Guys & Dolls. But to be fair to Fleming, Daniel-Day Lewis was close to signing for the Keira Knightley My Fair Lady when he moved onto the Nine job that was supposed to be someone else's. So things do change.

Second, there is a loooooong history of producers trying to get a film version of Guys & Dolls going, starting even before Chicago made movie musicals hot again. In many ways, getting the rights is the Holy Grail for everyone who wants to be in the movie musical business.

Almost all the rumors have been true... and almost all of them have quickly been shot down by the estates. Harvey Weinstein alone has floated at least 5 versions of the movie in the last decade.

What would be the smartest, most marketable idea for the film right now? Give it to Anne Fletcher, cast Gerry Butler as Sky, Amy Adams as Sister Sarah, Amanda Seyfried as Adelaide, and start trying to figure out which late-30-something stars can sing to play Nathan Detroit. Downey? Sandler? Stiller? Or push the envelope a little and go for Jim Sturgess, who feels like he could be the guy other guys follow into trouble.

Posted by dpoland at July 14, 2009 12:15 PM

Comments

Just as long as they don't go with the recent Broadway revival casting of Lauren Graham as Adelaide. Wonderful actress, but yeesh.

Posted by: MarkVH [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 01:48 PM

I knew you'd be the first to call it the "Big Fuckin' Deal Memo." I knew it. You just won me a bet. Thanks.

Posted by: Kristopher Tapley [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 01:50 PM

"a Guy Ritchie version of Guys & Dolls heading to feature production. "

Ugh.

Now, David Cronenberg's LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS?? Sign me up.

Despite how good Rock n Rolla was, he's a more famous WS Anderson to me. Sherlock Holmes looks unendurable.

Posted by: CleanSteve [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 01:57 PM

I actually think your fan-casting of "Guys and Dolls" would be terrific, particularly Butler.

And anyone remember when Vin Diesel was trying to get his own "Guys and Dolls" going with him as Sky and Nicole Kidman, just-post-"Moulin Rouge" as Sarah?

And who was the actor who played Harry the Horse in some recent Broadway revival and simply screamed all his lines? Ernie Sabella?

Posted by: SJRubinstein [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 03:10 PM

And someone was taking around a remake of "Little Shop" right now and when they pitch execs, the female ones are all like, "Awesome - 'Little shop, little shop of hor-rors!!"

And then they have to admit it's a remake of the original horror film, which is a great, fun pic, but just not the show.

Posted by: SJRubinstein [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 03:12 PM

Seriously: About 30 years ago, I saw an excellent all-black touring production of Guys and Dolls in Dallas, with Richard Roundtree as Sky Masterson. Made me forget all about John Shaft for more than two hours. So I wonder: Might the makers of any potential film version do well to consider a multi-ethnic cast?

Posted by: Joe Leydon [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 03:21 PM

That was one of the pitches, Joe... didn't take.

Posted by: David Poland [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 03:35 PM

Pity.

Posted by: Joe Leydon [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 03:50 PM

That's sad Dave if a multi-ethnic pitch didn't take...it'd be way cool.

Guy Ritchie? Then they should just call it "Guys".

Posted by: Lota [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 05:35 PM

Totally disagree re Graham in G&D. There's a reason she got the closing bow--she took the 4th lead and made it the star of the show.

Agree on Amy Adams, but I'd go Harry Connick Jr. for Sky--the role demands someone who can really sing. As for Nathan Detroit: please. The ONLY person who should be playing it, now and until he's too old to do so, is the man who took his name from the character: Nathan Lane.

Posted by: Cadavra [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2009 11:50 PM

I thought Butler was the weak link in Phantom. Don't see the appeal of his voice.

Posted by: yancyskancy [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 15, 2009 03:22 AM

Wasn't the general belief that Butler was terrible in Phantom of the Opera and that he couldn't sing? Although, tbh, I had forgotten he was even in that movie. Furthermore, I would have forgotten long ago that Emmy Rossum even exists if it weren't for Go Fug Yourself.

Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 15, 2009 03:41 AM

"Totally disagree re Graham in G&D. There's a reason she got the closing bow--she took the 4th lead and made it the star of the show."

The reason she got the closing bow is because she's the biggest name in the cast, nothing more. She gives it everything she's got, but she's completely miscast and plays it in monotone. I can't fault her for trying - Adelaide is an incredibly difficult part. But that doesn't make her any less wrong, wrong, wrong for it. Best thing about the revival is Bierko as Sky, with the actress playing Sister Sarah doing pretty solid work as well. Oliver Platt hisses his way through Nathan Detroit.

But what do I know? I'm actually a huge fan of the Joe Mankiewicz movie, which probably has more to do with my undying love for Jean Simmons than the movie itself.

Posted by: MarkVH [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 15, 2009 07:20 AM

If she's the biggest name in the cast, how come Platt got top billing?

Graham is not a star. The 2 or 3 million of us who loved GILMORE GIRLS like her, but the average joe has no idea who she is, and that goes double for most Broadway habitues.

I thought she was terrific, and so did the packed house I saw it with. Perhaps you caught her on an off night.

Posted by: Cadavra [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 15, 2009 12:23 PM

I also thought Butler sounded horrible in Phantom of the Opera. I don't know what Schumacher was thinking...that dude seriously has no taste.

Posted by: The Big Perm [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 15, 2009 12:47 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?