« Press Release - Focus Features Reminds Us That It Makes Money | Main | DP/30 Sneak Peek - Penelope Cruz on Nine »

November 12, 2009

What's A Thriller?

The remarkable success of Paranormal Activity is good reason for Paramount and the company that found the movie, DreamWorks, to crow... but is the claim sold to their resident flack/blogger that it is now the highest grossing R-rated thriller of the last decade fair to other films?

Inglourious Basterds $119,973,810
District 9 $115,646,235
Watchmen $107,509,799
Paranormal Activity $100,000,000
Wanted $134,508,551
300 $210,614,939
American Gangster $130,164,645
The Departed $132,384,315
The Matrix Reloaded $281,576,461
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines $150,371,112
The Matrix Revolutions $139,313,948
Bad Boys II $138,608,444
Road to Perdition $104,454,762
Hannibal $165,092,268
Black Hawk Down $108,638,745
Traffic $124,115,725

It is, however, the clear top grosser amongst the R-rate horror films...

Posted by dpoland at November 12, 2009 08:12 PM

Comments

Is the "highest grossing R-rated thriller of the last decade" a direct quote from a Paramount/Dreamworks mouthpiece or is it something that your bff Nikki or someone else made up who was too lazy to do some research and just looking for an attention grabbing headline?

I say the same phrase on indiewire.com as well, so are they getting their news from the same source?

If someone from Paramount/Dreamworks actually said this, they should be demoted to car park attendant for such a blatant lie. The movie will go down as one of the most successful movies of all time, related to budgeted spend. Isn't that enough?

Posted by: bulldog68 [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 08:36 PM

Should be 'saw' not 'say' in 2nd paragraph.

Posted by: bulldog68 [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 08:38 PM

Besides the title film in question, I saw all but one of the films on the list and thriller would not have been the first word I would've used to describe ANY of them.

Posted by: Triple Option [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 08:56 PM

Neither Paranormal Activity or most of the films on Dave's list are 'thrillers' in the traditional sense of the term. Most are action, adventure, sci-fi, or horror. But since those genres are not considered 'mature', the studios try to label them as thrillers. For example, I remember that Dimension bent over backwards to get people to call Scream a thriller. Paranormal Activity is a horror film, plain and simple. And on that note, it's second in R-rated fair only to Hannibal (Silence of the Lambs is a thriller/drama in my opinion, but Hannibal is a slasher film with opera in the background). Personally, I'd classify American Gangster and Traffic as dramas. But I know full well that every single person on this thread might have differing opinions on what film is what, which just makes it dumber that Paramount (or whomever started this) had to sully their remarkable achievement by lying about the genre in question.

Posted by: Scott Mendelson [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 08:59 PM

None of the movies on your list are "thrillers." The closest is probably Hannibal.

Posted by: Rothchild [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 09:14 PM

None of the movies on your list are "thrillers." The closest is probably Hannibal.

Thriller = horror. That's what execs and marketing gurus call a movie when they don't want it to be perceived as trashy.

Posted by: Rothchild [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 09:15 PM

Sorry for the double -- and now triple -- post. The thriller genre also spills over into adult movies with people in jeopardy. Basically Paramount's forte in the '90s. If there had been any big Ashley Judd/Morgan Freeman movies in the last decade they would count. And technically, you could make an argument for Taken.

Posted by: Rothchild [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 09:17 PM

I'm with Rothchild. None of those movies are thrillers except for Hannibal and MAYBE The Departed.

Posted by: The InSneider [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 09:51 PM

Yeah, where is Taken? Taken might not be the strictest thriller, but it's more of a thriller than three quarters of that list.

Posted by: a_loco [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 11:42 PM

I wouldn't argue with Taken, but I would argue with all the titles Dave has listed (inc. Paranormal Activity and perhaps excluding Hannibal).

Really, if you're gonna say Wanted is a thriller why not Transformers 2? I'd say Slumdog Millionaire is more of a thriller than Watchmen. Signs definitely more so than The Matrix sequels. What about The Sum of All Fears? etc

Posted by: KamikazeCamelV2.0 [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2009 11:55 PM

Considering that the movie is only rated R for language, it makes me wonder how much more it could have made if they had made a few insignificant snips to get the PG-13. As it stands, being the 5th highest grossing horror movie of the decade (I'm counting Hannibal, What Lies Beneath, The Ring, and The Grudge as beating it) still ain't bad.

Posted by: jeffmcm [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2009 01:18 AM

"It is, however, the clear top grosser amongst the R-rate horror films..."

"Hannibal" isn't a horror film??? Really??? What in the world is it then...

Also Everyon, "Taken" is PG-13 not R, and "Paranormal" is going to pass Watchmen," "Black Hawk Down," and "Road to Perdition" so I don't get the point of listing them period DP. Titles it can rightfully claim:

*2nd-highest grossing R-rated horror of the decade

*Highest grossing live-action movie released in September since "Sweet Home Alabama."

*Highest grossing R-rated Suspense movie of the decade

*For Paramount, the highest grossing horror movie since "Fatal Attraction.:

Posted by: EthanG [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2009 06:22 AM

Oh and for good measure:

*Higher than the top grossing Michael Mann movie of all time.

Posted by: EthanG [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2009 06:29 AM

Road to Perdition? You're willing to stretch that far?

Posted by: Josh Massey [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 13, 2009 08:39 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?